User talk:Ema--or

Welcome!

Hello, Ema--or, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Computational science. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SchreyP ^(messages) 23:29, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of numerical analysis after 1945, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Handbook of Mathematical Functions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your work on Engineering mathematics! I love to see more of these... SchreyP ^(messages) 12:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of things named after Isaac Newton

Hello, Ema--or, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, List of things named after Isaac Newton, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Newtonian. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

a link to the article you copied from
the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 15:59, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of things named after Isaac Newton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newton number (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ema--or/Timeline of computational physics has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timeline of computational physics, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of things named after Werner Heisenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heisenberg model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Timeline of computational physics was accepted

Timeline of computational physics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheEpicTracks (talk) 00:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Computational wave dynamics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Boussinesq equations

List of things named after Werner Heisenberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Observer effect

Theoretical physics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Copernican

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of things named after Pierre-Simon Laplace

Hi, I'm Missionedit. Ema--or, thanks for creating List of things named after Pierre-Simon Laplace!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Great list! A few more sources would be good though.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Anastasia (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of things named after Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lorentzian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of things named after Erwin Schrodinger) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of things named after Erwin Schrodinger, Ema--or!

Wikipedia editor Tritario just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job.

To reply, leave a comment on Tritario's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Theoretical physics

Two of your recent edits to Theoretical physics resulted in incomplete sentences. Would you please clean them up? Thanks! — Anita5192 (talk) 01:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Hessian equation was accepted

Hessian equation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AioftheStorm (talk) 03:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of things named after Peter Debye) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of things named after Peter Debye, Ema--or!

Wikipedia editor FreeRangeFrog just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Very nice :)

To reply, leave a comment on FreeRangeFrog's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of important publications in physics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William G Hoover

The article William G Hoover has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jab843 (talk) 01:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary Ann Mansigh

The article Mary Ann Mansigh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 19:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thomas Wainwright may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Thomas Wainwright (footballer, (1879-1949)]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:42, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've already asked for offending article to be deleted or moved. Ema--or (talk) 23:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Thomas Wainwright (footballer, (1879-1949)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Thomas Wainwright (footballer, (1879-1949). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Thomas Wainwright (footballer, 1879-1949). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Thomas Wainwright (footballer, 1879-1949) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. If you see above, I had already tried to move the article. The brackets don't match, so I asked for it to be deleted. So no problem at all. Ema--or (talk) 02:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of women in computing

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Timeline of women in computing, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://lykkeliginoerdland.dk/2012/05/15/kvinderne-der-gik-foran/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of things named after Joseph Fourier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finite Fourier transform. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Theoretical physics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mathematical theory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 1 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Timeline of scientific computing page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfication

I have userfied the article you requested to User:Ema--or/Einstein syndrome. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Underlying event

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Underlying event requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://muon.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/underlying-event-a-definitive-study-by-cdf/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gronk Oz (talk) 09:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Structure function, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Form factors. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Underlying event has been accepted

Underlying event, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 08:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Computational physics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Computational complexity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of things named after Friedrich Bessel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of things named after Friedrich Bessel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:54DF:14C7:12B6:9034 (talk) 00:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Computational Physics

Hello Ema--or, I am improving the computational physics article as part of the wiki education initiative. I would appreciate any input you may have, as you seem to have worked extensively on the article in the past. Serrion (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - happy to help!! Ema--or (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of things named after Charles-Augustin de Coulomb) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of things named after Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, Ema--or!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This is an interesting and probably comprehensive list, indeed.

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of things named after Louis Pasteur, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lycée Pasteur and Lycée Louis Pasteur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of things named after Felix Bloch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bloch's theorem and Bloch function. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ema--or. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Ema--or/Italian school of differential geometry

Hello, Ema--or. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Italian school of differential geometry".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. RileyBugz (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Numerical dispersion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artifact. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Applied mathematics into Applicable mathematics. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline of modern scientific computing

The article Timeline of modern scientific computing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant page; duplicates material in Timeline of scientific computing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blueclaw (talk) 02:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timeline of computational mathematics

The article Timeline of computational mathematics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of Timeline of scientific computing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blueclaw (talk) 02:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Herschel family

This has been reviewed and tagged for 3 issues. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ema--or. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of things named after Freeman Dyson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of things named after Freeman Dyson, Ema--or!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Is this list really necessary? Unless it can be substantially expanded, it appears essentially redundant to the first paragraph of Freeman Dyson or Freeman Dyson#Career.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 03:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Simon's problems moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Simon's problems, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:33, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon problems (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Simon's problems instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon problems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon problems, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 00:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ema--or! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 00:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon problems (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Broccoli and Coffee was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon problems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon problems, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 04:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon problems (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AmericanAir88 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Other dup. has been deleted. No references either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon problems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon problems, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AmericanAir88 (talk) 20:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ema--or. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theoretical physics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tttttttttttt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tttttttttttt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Ann Mansigh (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ema--or/Mary Ann Mansigh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ema--or/Mary Ann Mansigh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mary Ann Mansigh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Ann Mansigh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It wasn’t accepted via AFC, it was declined! would you quit with the falsehood & being disruptive Celestina007 (talk) 20:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Well it seems the correction bots aren't roaming so fast. Hi there, see my comments here,here, and here. Again no offense taken for misunderstandings. Ciao.... 21:09, 10 February 2021‎ Ema--or[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mary Ann Mansigh for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ann Mansigh. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see these messages, approx 12hrs apart, so couldn't answer/act/much less act in time. Too late for you, the venerable Celestina has set me to rights(aright/a-right?)! Ema--or (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC) I err, she didn't mention canvassing. Ta-ra. Ema--or (talk) 14:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Ann Mansigh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mary Ann Mansigh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Too late. I've already edited this thing at least 2ce before reading this. It was left incomplete so as to encourage others to fill it out, but it seems the occasional apathy and unhelpfulness (yes, assume good faith) left me no choice. 20:56, 10 February 2021‎ Question to you celeste and nathan. If I make a a decent quality article, are (such) edits disruptive? Just out of curiosity. ;) Cheers .... ~~ Edit - Sorry for not spelling your name correctly/using correct name, *celestina*.

Nomination of Mary Ann Mansigh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Ann Mansigh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ann Mansigh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair play. Thanks for notifying anyway. I guess we all gotta get in trouble with sb sometime.... User:Ema--or

Administrators' noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC) I've decided to increase the cooling off period between some of my posts, to tone things down. That's right, to take increasing refractory breaks. ;) (uh uh uuh. That was that actress said: excusez mon francais; naughty naughty naughty). As there is a bit of "heat" from sheriffs, ya-know. But I'm not leavin town, yet, oh no, nooo... Ema--or (talk) 02:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Just keep head down, leave discu. for now and stay editing, ie while I still can lol hehehehh Ema--or (talk) 02:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying WikiProjects of deletion discussions

Your recent notifications breach WP:CANVASS. In future please post a neutral notice to notify Wikiprojects. An example of such a neutral notice can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways/Archive 48#Sammy the Shunter AfD. Mjroots (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

just an fyi....an easy way to make neutral notifications is to use a wikilink to the deletion discussion as the section title and make the body one simple sentence: "A topic that may be of interest to this project is under discussion at the above-linked AfD. Your participation is encouraged." To maintain neutrality, you must notify every project that follows the article and none that don't. 174.212.222.24 (talk) 19:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

discussions, discussions

My defence starts here.

It seems the past few days have seen me acquire some (arch)nemeses. But I will start with the first, the very very first, Celestina (some cool nicknames I see out this one, Celli(e)/Celly, Cece, and of course the ubiquitous Tina). While she didn't seem too pleased about my actions I tried consultation, diplomacy and engagement for feedback but got none. Then I approached on her page, and instead of answering, msg ignored (spellcheck ingirted?). instead, eventually (eventfully? more like uneventfully, heh), I was deleted. just goes to be sayin, there's no you can tell some people, though. But [ain't mad at atcha], though... Ema--or (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s today come to my attention that the above is polemic. Mmmmm, mm. Well, well, oh deary me. Ema--or (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to make a song, about this, don't worry, no names, just good clean fun. Ema--or (talk) 19:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gentle nudge, by way of WP:ANI

Page in question: Talk:Mary Ann Mansigh

Hey, Ema. Listen, article talk pages are for discussion — i.e. "talking" (into the ether doesn't count). They are not intended for a series of continuous comments and queries just from one, single user. If nobody responds the first or second (or let's say, even 3rd) time, then it's best just to wait until they do. Otherwise, it comes across as rather WP:FORUM-y, which is frowned upon and, ultimately, is a prohibited practice. Thank you in advance for your close attention to this matter. Regards, El_C 15:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enough time has passed for me to consider a reply. I think I have it, but I want to wait. Still, shouldn't let too much time go by..... Ema--or (talk) 22:46, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Time has cooled things down, and changed my original plan, seems to me. I was going to post a long monologue on article's talk page, but I've seen better to do otherwise. Perhaps everyone's moved on, too.

I suppose I have a difference of opinion, but I don't own wikipedia, neither am I in power, an admin etc. Frankly I'm starting not to care ?about trouble? anymore, maybe I'm already there. I by nature might've been tempted to give my reaction one of defiance, debate and satire/teasing/mild ridicule (radulae/radicle//aedicule?) but I have it doesn't serve any purpose and frankly I am tired from the whole afd affair. thrilling it may be, but in the end the doesn't help anyone.

I've already spent more than a mote of time on this issue, and more than enough edits for this year.

Still i got a few things to point (copint?) out.

I've exhausted my role in this conversation, for now. everything is now on this page's for the future. Hopefully we will see progress/more material to improve article.

Since my warning(s) and thread closure, I've also attempted engage with any other poster in this page, and stay relevant. But feel free to close (per headbomb), archive, or otherwise move my comments. 20:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

I haven't seemingly addressed this coherently. Maybe time not only cools all feelings but dulls thoughts too. Ema--or (talk) 08:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Statistical physics has been nominated for deletion

Category:Statistical physics has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. OpenScience709 (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Numerical artefacts has been nominated for renaming

Category:Numerical artefacts has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

Some important follow-up questions have been posted at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 August 1 which you need to come back and answer. If you don't, it may be assumed that you no longer wish to pursue this request and it could be closed without further action. Stifle (talk) 08:17, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]