User talk:Elpuppy
AfD nomination of Cristian Oviedo
[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Cristian Oviedo. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristian Oviedo. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MediaMNG for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. SummerPhD (talk) 11:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
I am offended that anyone may think I am part of some sort of Media Company because I choose to add knowledge about a man comparable to Bruce Lee, Steve Reeves and Arnold Schwarzenegger. All who have wikipedia articles. These 4 men have been successful because they demand as much out of their profession as their bodies. Maybe because they appeared different from the average human body and gained popularity because of fitness does not limit their talents to just lifting heavy objects. Gaining exposure through fitness was a display of their will. Arnold Schwarzenegger with his Olympia titles, Bruce Lee with his lessons of martial arts to the stars, Steve Reeves with his rugged good looks combined with his fitness titles and now Sebastian Siegel who writes like Bruce Lee, being photogenic like Steve Reeves and building up his film resume like Arnold.
I feel a sense of discrimination because neutral secondary sources of knowledge are not being considered for making Sebastian Siegel worthy of a Wikipedia article. I have been a fan for years and edited other articles on wikipedia. Sebastian Siegel has played significant roles in film and television shows that have grossed millions of dollars and been given critical acclaim. This article has been up for years and was attacked by one individual. The person (Sebastian Siegel) whom this article is about is very notable in multiple forms of media, all thoroughly referenced from a variety of neutral sources throughout the internet. The information does not come from a single source of knowledge and the deleted Sebastian Siegel Wikipedia article pointed and linked to other documenting sources. On the talk page the attack on the article was clearly and pragmatically defended by many neutral sources but because the attacker has a long history of wiki editing, the article was deleted - completely ridiculous.
This article (Sebastian Siegel Wikipedia Entry) has a strong and rapid growing interest.This wikipedia article (Sebastian Siegel) must stay and should be protected and I do not want to be labeled as a sock puppet to anything. I want my account reactivated and unblocked. I have attached an article from Celebrity Society for another neutral perspective on this notable subject, Sebastian Siegel. ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/44256945@N08/4068558843/sizes/o/ )
(User talk:ElPuppy) 16:40, 23 July 2010
The file File:Saco blanco.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned photo; was uploaded for article that was deleted
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logan Talk Contributions 17:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
