User talk:Elowa
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Elowa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on [[user talk:— Ched (talk) 19:30, 22 August 2019 (UTC)|my talk page]], or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
Nomination of Bijoy Nandan Shahi for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bijoy Nandan Shahi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bijoy Nandan Shahi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AssadFin (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Prezzee Pty Ltd
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Prezzee Pty Ltd, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- The page WP:NCORP will give you a better idea of what Wikipedia considers to be a notable business. Stating the business's activity, fundraising, shareholding and personnel doesn't do the job, after all, every business has those attributes. Cabayi (talk) 22:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Murch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Your edits are problematic
[edit]Most of your recent edits are NOT HELPFUL and have to be reverted. E.g., at Lighthouse of Alexandria you inserted a circular redirect that links back to the same article. At Elephant bird, you inserted a link to a disambiguation page that can only confuse the reader. Both of these errors you have made many times. In addition, you are using a misleading edit summary of "added citation" for these actions - you are not adding citations, you are inserting wikilinks. - Please either stop this or spend a lot more time double-checking your edits. Currently you are mostly creating work for other people who have to clean up after you. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Harsh Chhaya
- Culture of India
- added a link pointing to Dhuti
- Fashion (2008 film)
- added a link pointing to Industry
- Michigan City, Indiana
- added a link pointing to Washington Park
- Netsuke
- added a link pointing to Helen
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 11
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Cryptochiridae
- added a link pointing to Superfamily
- Leucosioidea
- added a link pointing to Superfamily
- Majoidea
- added a link pointing to Superfamily
- Parthenopidae
- added a link pointing to Superfamily
- Picea koraiensis
- added a link pointing to Scale
- Rafflesia manillana
- added a link pointing to Taxonomy
- Spondylus ostreoides
- added a link pointing to Radial
- Spondylus visayensis
- added a link pointing to Marine
- Water bird
- added a link pointing to Inhabit
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
National varieties of English
[edit]
Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. JACKINTHEBOX • TALK 08:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Not sure what to make out of your reply. One of the admins User:Cyphoidbomb insisted Indianism is not allowed even on articles exclusively related to India. I hope he clarifies his position against this differing opinion from another senior editor Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Ihaveabandonedmychild: It's odd that you're responding to a two-month-old notice on another editor's talk page to get clarification about this instead of asking me directly. I also don't know what specific edit the notice refers to, but this should be pretty simple to understand. From MOS:TIES:
"An article on a topic that has strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation should use the (formal, not colloquial) English of that nation."
Since India uses a form of English built on the British standard, in an article about Shah Rukh Khan, we'd use British spelling variants. In an article about Brad Pitt, we would use American spelling variants. The prior discussion you are referring to had to do with an ambiguous India-specific colloquialism, which is not likely to be understood by our global readership. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Ihaveabandonedmychild: It's odd that you're responding to a two-month-old notice on another editor's talk page to get clarification about this instead of asking me directly. I also don't know what specific edit the notice refers to, but this should be pretty simple to understand. From MOS:TIES:
- User:Cyphoidbomb, "Glamorous" is not a colloquial word as far as Indian English is concerned, as it is common in articles that are rather formal. I can furnish references if you wish. It is also quite common in Wikipedia biography articles and its pervasiveness proves that it is a rather acceptable term in Wiki encyclopedia. See the search result https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Glamorous+roles&title=Special:Search&profile=default&fulltext=1&ns0=1
It has been used in two biography of non-Indian Hollywood actresses and of course,in countless articles relating to Indian actresses and has survived there foe ages without attracting attention from admins. I am still not sure why you are so persistent on your stance.
Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Palm-Wine Drinkard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folktale.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi Elowa, you recently edited Vanniyar page and changed cited information from BMC Genomics report by BioMed Central without any appropriate reason. I've reverted it for now but if you find anything disputed from this journal report than you can start discussion topic on talk page. HinduKshatrana (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |