User talk:ElooKoN/Archive2019/December

This is an archive of past discussions with User:ElooKoN. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Unblock Request 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElooKoN/Archive2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a new appeal because I have used the wrong code block before; please also have a look into the rationale of the declined ban appeal I made before. The ban was invoked, because my account was suspected to advertise or promote on Wikipedia, which is wrong. The article »Wie die Telekom mit unserem Vertrauen spielt« on my website elookon.de was written by me and I were not paid for it. The article »Telekom beendet DNS-Hijacking« was written by an author of golem.de and I am not affiliated to this site. The edit only recited important facts which are publicly accessible.--ElooKoN (talk) 13:11, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you agreed not to link to your own website or add yourself to articles, maybe someone would unblock you. However, this unblock request has been open for three weeks without anyone responding. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Maybe, but of course I don't. There is no reason to not refer to my own work when it is the only and the primary resource. If another user would have filed a criminal complaint, I would have used his resource.--ElooKoN (talk) 07:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElooKoN/Archive2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The ban was invoked, because my account was suspected to advertise or promote on Wikipedia, which is wrong. The article »Wie die Telekom mit unserem Vertrauen spielt« on my website elookon.de was written by me and I were not paid for it. The article »Telekom beendet DNS-Hijacking« was written by an author of golem.de and I am not affiliated to this site. The edit only recited important facts which are publicly accessible.--ElooKoN (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As your sole purpose appears to be to promote your own website and your own work, and as you cannot agree to not link to your website, and as you cannot rename, I see no point to unblocking you. -- Deep fried okra 13:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

@User:Deepfriedokra: Why should I change my name?--ElooKoN (talk) 14:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.