User talk:Elman Həsənli

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Treaty of Zuhab. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Unrelated addition, 2nd time. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Turkification. (..as well as more unsourced/ungrounded additions at Ahmadilis, Turkic Khaganate, etc.). - LouisAragon (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More disruptive unsourced editing at Iltutmish, Ancient City of Aleppo, etc. Looking at the compelling evidence (i.e. the fact you never respond, never write edit-summaries, and are literally only interested in spreading pro-Azerbaijani unsourced content), its safe to say you are not here to build this encyclopedia. - LouisAragon (talk) 11:33, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into History of the Middle East. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely, pursuant to the above complaint. Swarm ♠ 08:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]