User talk:Elispall
![]() Hello, Elispall, and welcome to Wikipedia! | |
![]() 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia |
![]() |
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place |
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation(s)
[edit]Your contributions are appreciated. You are very welcome here. However, I have encountered possible copyright violation(s). Some or all of the content you added in a recent edit to Lovely Professional University in this edit(s) appears to have been copy pasted from this source and has been removed.
Please remember that you must write in your own words. We cannot copy and paste from other websites. If I have made an error, please accept my apologies.
For further information, please read Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you have questions, please ask. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your suggestion! I will keep it in mind and shall read more about the Wikipedia policies to avoid any further error. Elispall (talk) 18:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you kindly for your understanding. If there is anything you ever need or have any questions, please ask. Thank you, and happy editing. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit] Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 10:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Puffing up Lovely Professional University
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lovely Professional University, you may be blocked from editing. Arkhaminsanity (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I see that you've been warned already about adding advert material to the page. I'll get an admin involved if you keep it up. King Kunta (talk) 14:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lovely Professional University. This is your last warning. King Kunta (talk) 12:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- I have added citations to certain sections of Lovely Professional University which as per my knowledge as well as according to the policies of Wikipedia is not wrong and thus cannot be termed as Vandalism either. This was done with the intent to improve it by ensuring that the material mentioned is aptly referenced as per the message in the page's maintenance template. Further, i added information about the university's recognition and memberships along with apt reference which again is an important information about the university and thus should exist on it's Wikipedia page.Elispall (talk) 18:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
'Events' or any of the other topics you keep trying to add don't qualify for the encyclopedia. This isn't a college admissions site. It's obvious that you have done affiliation with the Institute in question. Refrain from making further edits to the page. King Kunta (talk) 06:29, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 12:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Edit warring warning
[edit]Hi. Please do not edit war against multiple editors. Use te article talk page instead to advance your argument. Thanks. El_C 19:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Adding promotional content to Lovely Professional University
[edit]Other editors feel that you are adding promotional content to Lovely Professional University. I am not saying that your edits are promotional, but because others do, and they revert you, your edits must be considered controversial. For that reason, please discuss further edits to that article at Talk:Lovely Professional University before you add them to the article. Please get consensus from the community. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 17:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)