User talk:Eliscoming1234

Welcome!

Hello, Eliscoming1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Camp Hemshekh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 00:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Camp Hemshekh

A tag has been placed on Camp Hemshekh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 00:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Camp Hemshekh

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Camp Hemshekh meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Hemshekh. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Cunard (talk) 18:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question, what if no else votes? Does my vote pass? I mean really admin, just look at the Page, the automatic deleting thingy is obviously no longer relevant after the article was lengthened. Please just remove the nomination. Thank you.

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Camp Hemshekh has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/hemshekhzingt)). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Camp Hemshekh do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/hemshekhzingt). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Camp Hemshekh. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Hemshekh

These links appear to be WP:SPAM. Please review the linked policy and reply how you feel this information conforms to this policy. Additionally, please be aware of WP:RRR and that you should bring your suggested external links to the talk page of the article instead of simply re-editing the page. If there is any way I can help, please feel free to comment on my talk page. Tiggerjay (talk) 03:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As stated previously on you talk page - please review the policy regarding external links, and let me know why you think your links are an exception. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please be aware that facebook is generally not considered an appropriate link or reference since it is not a reliable source. I really appreciate your interest in creating an article, but you really should review the policies on creating articles, which would avoid a lot of the problems you're encountering. I would really suggest you read: Wikipedia:Starting an article. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in adding to Wikipedia, however, it is apparent by your comments that you have not actually read the link pertaining to spam, please do so here: wp:spam before you comment further. Wikipedia is not a place for marketing, advertising or recruiting students for your camp. Please let me know what encyclopedic value you believe this links add, otherwise, they simply look like marketing - which is basically what you are reinforcing by your statements. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of S.K.I.F.

A tag has been placed on S.K.I.F. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY:"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project

Hi Sorry to disappoint I am unlikely to join as I know very little about the Bund and my edit was a simple correction of spelling. Due to the fact that Labour, when referring to the Bund has a U in.安東尼 TALK ^圣诞快乐 21:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project Task Force

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yiddish Encyclopedia

The progress we're making is through cooperation with the Google Books scanning project. Thanks for your interest.--Pharos (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bund Task Force

Shana tova. It was nice chatting with you the other evening. Please keep my name confidential; Wikipedia editors stongly value our privacy, and outing an editor is taken very seriously here.

How many editors have expressed an interest in joining the Bund Task Force? Do you think it would be a better fit under WikiProject Judaism or WikiProject Organized Labour? You can reply to me here or on my Talk page. Thanks. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 23:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shanah Tova. Yes, it was. Feel free to contact me about whatever and whenever you want. Keep mine confidential as well. Although, if people really wanted to find it, it would be quite easy. But, once the task force is created, it will be more difficult.

I thought that it would fit the best under both Projects. I got that idea from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/Task forces

You, and four veteran editors. I have at least four other people who need to get accounts.

In a little less than a month, I will be going to place where about a hundred Bundists know either me, or my family. In theory, that will make the Project grow exponentially.

I really need help in creating this task force. It is the final step. I think I can do everything else. I just re-posted my call for help, and I will post it in other places as well.

I recently added new sub-sections to the website,

http://bundwiki.weebly.com/.

Thanks.

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project Task Force

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:30, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bund project

Hi. Thanks for inviting me. I would be glad to help, just let me know if there is any concrete task. Also, I set up the Category:Bundism. At the moment, i don't have any Bundist articles in pipe-line, though. --Soman (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank YOU for wanting to help. Thank you for creating that category, that will help very much. We just need to create a "Task Force", and then the work can begin. The problem is, I cant figure out how to create it, its to complicated for me. If you know anyone who can help with that, please tell them to talk to me. Thanks.

P.S. If you have a Facebook, please join the group: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=138977426688&ref=ts

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 22:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project Task Force

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. I hope I'm familiar enough to be able to contribute. My knowledge basically comes from interest in Polish interwar history. I'll try to do something on Victor Alter over the weekend and look around for what else I can find. Radeksz (tilda broken on keyboard)

My pleasure. I saw what you have done. Wonderful! Whatever you are doing, keep it up. The article about the Jewish Labour Bund takes priority, as in the future, that article needs to be the shining example of this Task Force.

I have a question, are you User:Soman AND User:Radeksz?--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:08, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm just Radeksz, no matter what somebody tells you ;). I noticed the main article on the Bund needs a lot more sourcing and inlining. I can't work on it this weekend as my internet access is sporadic, but I'll try to do some of that next week.radek (talk) 03:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes it needs that. It also needs to be expanded exponentially. People have written books about the Bund, the article needs that information. You are doing great, please keep up the good work.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From Brussels, Belgium

If I can help, just tell me. I wrote the Bund article in the Dutch wikipedia and developed the Interwar Poland and bibliographical sections of the article in the French wikipedia. I made a few edits in 2005 on the English Bund article (insurrection of the Warsaw Ghetto + postwar in Poland + 100th anniversary celebrations in Brussels). I also wrote the Folkspartei articles in English and French. I have got photocopies of several pages of Bernard K. Johnpoll, The politics of futility. The General Jewish Workers Bund of Poland, 1917-1943, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 1967. I've also got a complete photocopy of (not Bund-friendly) C. Belazel Sherman, Bund, Galuth nationalism, Yiddishism, Herzl Institute Pamphlet no.6, New York, 1958. I think it would be interesting to develop the Polish and Lithuanian episodes of Bund's electoral participation. A git your! --Pylambert (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats great! Keep up the good work. Do you know how to create a "Task Force" on Wikipedia? That is the final step until we can start working. I will keep you informed. Thanks.

If you have a Facebook, please join the group: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=138977426688&ref=search&sid=596752329.4099337505..1

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 23:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Bund on Wikipedia" Project Task Force

--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA for main article

I think the main purpose of the Task Force at this point should be trying to clean up and improve the main Bund article to at least GA status - we would probably want it FA as a sort of a "flagship" eventually. It might be useful at this point to ask somebody more experienced about what kind of things/improvements would actually be needed before the "drastic" step of actually nominating it is taken. I've been trying to add references (which is an obvious thing it needs) but aside from that I think it needs a stylistic rewrite so that the various parts flow together. More free images would also help a lot. Given the multitude of (and their availability!) of sources on the topic this is a very under-written article.radek (talk) 07:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. Suggestions are always appreciated. The General Jewish Labour Bund article is currently listed as our Task Force's top priority. However, the participants (including myself) have most definitly been focusing their efforts on different fronts. I've wanted to use that article as the example/"flagship" article, but it has not been good enough to use. Set up a discussion on the Task Force page, so we can mobilize and organize our efforts. Thank you for all you have done so far. Keep up the great work. Thanks. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 17:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italic names

Re: Kultur Lige. Wikipedia don't support italicized article names. Check Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions) for details. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 23:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, darn. Thanks for letting me know. I've noticed that you have been active in Bundist-related articles. Are you interested in participating in the Jewish Labour Bund Task Force? Thanks again. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 00:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kultur Lige got DYKed

[1] - hopefully the other ones will follow soon (I was a bit sloppy in some of the refs - I think I took care of it though).radek (talk) 06:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great. Thanks for doing this. Also, thanks for keeping me updated. Make sure to add this to the Task Force page under the designated section. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 15:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

signed up

Hi, just signed up, more than happy to help with image and graphics related activities (photoshoping, svg-ing, yada yada).--Goldsztajn (talk) 05:53, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

It's great to hear that you want to get involved. Are you the woman I talked to at Camp Hemshekhs 50th Anniversary Reunion? (I have a feeling you are. I just want to make sure.) I do have something that you can do, but I will talk about that later. If you want something quick to do, you can add photos to Bund articles. YIVO's online exhibitions have amazing photos. Thank you for your interest.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disappoint, but I wasn't at the function you mention, so we've never met. But either way if you have some specific requests for work on images, just leave me a message on my talk page. I'm aware of the YIVO material, although there isn't actually that much online as far as I can see (or am I missing something?) --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the late response. Once I have time to work out the details, I do have a big thing with digital imaging that you can do. I will add the links to photos provided by YIVO shortly, so say tuned. Also, how did you find out about this Project? Thanks. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 17:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when you reply please use the {{talkback|your username}} template on my talk page so I know you are replying. I found out about the project on the organised labour project page, I'm a member of that project. Regards --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry. Wait, do I post that here, or your Talk Page? Oh, ok. Please spread the word! Just contact me if you have any concerns. Thanks. {{talkback|Eliscoming1234}}--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 03:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:) Hi...sorry, maybe I should have been more specific... when you leave a reply here (ie on your talk page), you should leave the template {{talkback|your username}} on my talk page (just hit the new section part, add a title, drop the template in--with your username--and save. Btw, don't use the nowiki tags when you place the template on the talk page otherwise it won't work--nowiki tags are for displaying code without the code being active). That way, I'll get a notification saying you've left a message. You can read more about the talkback system if you want, I prefer it as it keeps conversations together, rather than split up as had previously developed on wiki. regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 01:21, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thought

Hi there, please remember that anyone can edit for a reason; no one is or should be forced to get an account. Thanks. —Ed (talk • contribs) 04:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no, dont worry, I know. I didnt have room to explain myself. What I wanted to say was that the edits that editors without accounts make can be more "verifiable" (cant think of the right word). This is extremely important regarding controversial or debated content. This is the reason why some articles are "semi-protected" (users without accounts cant make edits. Usually due to constant vandalism).

Kids for World Health

I've noted some problems at the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moslem

Its not a big deal. I read it here. If it says that it is considered offensive, then in this specific case it should be considered a POV. I dont make the rules, just follow them. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 23:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If some people consider it offensive, then surely it's POV to remove the term, isn't it? That is changing the article to reflect that POV. Why do you consider that NPOV, while using the term as we always did before 15-20 years ago is POV? -- Zsero (talk) 00:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Haggada of the Jewish Idea

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Haggada of the Jewish Idea, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.thejewisheye.com/haggadaji.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I basically fixed the problem. --Eliscoming1234 (talk) 22:57, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bund Skif.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bund Skif.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey brotha!

Hey brotha! I am sorry to be tangling with you on a few of these articles! It is nothing personal, I hope you understand! It just looks like you are violating Wikipedia policy in several ways, and that you are here to defend political interests rather than advance some of these articles to neutrality. Are you with me on that? I just want you to understand where I'm coming from, and that just because I keep knocking you with reverts that doesn't mean we can't have a friendly chat about it!

But I will keep on you, of course, haha! Your 3 reverts on Baruch Goldstein, for instance, are clearly flying in the face of the opinion of me and another editor. Do you see where that opinion is represented in the edit summary? That calling his killing a murder is imprecise, that to say so is politically loaded? Is that clear? Hey let's not be those dopey editors who revert each other and then get mad at each other, OK? Happy new year! DBaba (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'll just leave that one alone, by the way, although I disagree with it. (I expect someone else to come along, eventually, and knock it back, anyway.) Peace, DBaba (talk) 18:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I do not hold anything against you or the other editor. The edits I made on the Baruch Goldstein article were not politically motivated. I was indeed making the article more neutral. I will continue to make those edits. Thanks.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 18:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Your edits are POV, and watching your edit history, I can see why. If you want, we can take this to WP:30. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 12:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My edits are not POV, they are historically correct. You saying the edits are POV makes you a POV. Please bring in a third opinion. Thanks.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 17:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

explanation for the inactivity

At the moment I'm topic banned from any articles relating to Eastern Europe which pretty much covers anything related to the Bund. I wish I could help but I can't. For the long term, it'd be good to get a list of articles that need to be created, expanded, and developed if this project is going to grow. In the future I hope I can help with the history part - a list of tasks which needs to be done (which I notice hasn't been update for awhile) would be a useful guideline at least for some preliminary research.radek (talk) 09:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your last edit on the Mossad page

I have seen that you deleted the section on the Mossad recent alleged activity in Dubai without advising no one and without taking discussion on that on the article's talk page. The reasons you mentioned in the articles edit summary are just not enough. If the section is poorly written and sourced your role is to ask for sources (which are abundant, let's don't ignore that) and to improve the language -not to delete! If there is someother, good reason for the deletion I would like to lnow about it.--Gilisa (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, while the section does require more attention, the issues you raised can be easily addressed and a complete removal is not necessary. -Reconsider ! 08:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am aware that it was a very drastic edit. I made that edit so editors would quickly change the section. No harm intended. Thanks.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't harm intended but that's realy poor reasoning and surely the wrong way.--Gilisa (talk) 17:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cave of the Patriarchs massacre

I saw your edits to Cave of the Patriarchs massacre. Please be aware that this is a highly controversial article. You should check the talk page before repeating your edits. Debresser (talk) 18:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but I am aware. I have read the talk page. I will discuss on the talk page from now on.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. That is what I wanted. I is important to seek consensus. And I'll be happy not to be the only voice of reason there. Debresser (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of B'nai Elim

I have nominated B'nai Elim, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2010_June_25#B.27nai_Elim. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Rrburke (talk) 02:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be able to address this problem until at least a month from now as I won't be at a computer. Please say this on the discussion page. I am willing to discuss and make changes to the article. Thank you.--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 04:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Motl Zelmanowicz

Hi Eli. I don't know whether you're familiar with Wikipedia's WP:Did you know program for putting new articles on the encyclopedia's front page. Motl Zelmanowicz might qualify if you can make it just a little bit longer and if you change the "raw" URLs in the footnotes. Please see WP:WIADYK and WP:Did you know/Additional rules for details. (Item D3 of the additional rules has a link to a tool that may help with the footnotes.)

Please leave me a message if you have any questions. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kids for World Health for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Kids for World Health, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids for World Health until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:13, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

just some thoughts

Hi--I don't in anyway want to discourage your efforts (which are excellent and far more than my contributions so far), so I hope this is taken in a constructive spirit...I would be careful about this. Have a look a question 13.7 here. I think if you are working on something on Wikipeadia and soliciting donations of funds it should be directed to the Wiki Foundation and not as is set up on the blog. There is also an ambiguity of seeking donations to the "project" (who is the project? an organisation? a person?). There is in Wiki no "ownership" over items by editors, admins, projects etc...in general content must be shared throughout Wikipeadia (copyright items are the big exception). Best regards --Goldsztajn (talk) 19:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive criticism is appreciated. Good point, I didn't think of that issue. However, I don't see how 13.7 is related. But, again, I can see where there would be honest concern. Do you know of a different place where this issue is addressed? With your thoughts in mind, I'll go into better depth on donations on the page within the coming days. Let me know what you think. Thank you very much for your efforts!--Eliscoming1234 (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re Adrienne Cooper

Hi. Just to let you know that you should be careful with reflinks, particularly to avoid bare URLs. Yours, Quis separabit? 22:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Westchester Interfaith/Interagency Network for Disaster and Emergency Recovery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mamaroneck, NY (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023 Labour Edit-a-thon

2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon

Hello, Eliscoming1234!
During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste {{subst:WPLABOR/2023}} on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour

Myotus (talk) 15:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]