User talk:Eleven Special

Hello, Eleven Special, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Kannie | talk 21:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

I don't mind at all! I'm really flattered. Thanks! Fanficgurl February 23 2008 3:17 (UTC)

Deletion reviews

Hello. The template shortcuts are {{drt}} and {{drb}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Eliot Spitzer

Hello. Thanks for your contribution to Eliot Spitzer. Firstly a statement of minutia like that does not belong in the main article per WP:Undue. It may be permissible at Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal. However, in order to insert a statement like that, you'll need to find a source other than the Smoking gun, which contains only the partial affidavit and is therefor a primary source. See WP:Sources. The assertion may be true, but try finding it in a secondary source such as the New York Times and at least one other paper before inserting it again. Mrprada911 (talk) 22:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

As a sock of a banned user, I have no choice but to block you. Kwsn (Ni!) 14:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? What is going on?!? Eleven Special (talk) 14:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eleven Special (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sure why I've been blocked. I don't even know what a "sock" is. Please explain. Eleven Special (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see WP:SOCK. — Yamla (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eleven Special (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Yamla. Thank you. I'm not a sock. Please review. Eleven Special (talk) 16:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's no reason to disbelieve a checkuser's analysis. — Sandstein (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eleven Special (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What I'm asserting is that the checkuser is wrong. I'm obviously editing from behind a corporate proxy and this is a false positive. I am not the individual who peformed the vandalism. Eleven Special (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Page protected to prevent further abuse, email address given to appeal CU block findings. — MBisanz ^talk 18:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My apologizes, but a checkuser was preformed and the results were given here. Sorry to not include that before. Kwsn (Ni!) 17:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well has anyone explored the possibility that this is a false positive? You can see from my contributions that I have been anything but a disruptive or tendentious editor. Eleven Special (talk) 17:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, you can appeal it to "arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org" Any more {{unblock}} requests will result in full protection of this page. MBisanz ^talk 18:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]