User talk:ElectricController/Archive 1

Archive 1

ElectricController, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ElectricController! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:CHIP computer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CHIP computer.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ElectricController! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 11:52, Wednesday, February 3, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Possibly unfree File:CHIP Computer logo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CHIP Computer logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Windows Updated Family Tree.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Windows Updated Family Tree.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Hello, I'm Dan56. I noticed that you made a change to an article, MTV Unplugged No. 2.0, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm ԱշոտՏՆՂ. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2016 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for this. It was a mistake--ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 19:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

@ԱշոտՏՆՂ:- No problem :) - ElectricController (talk page) 19:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dance wiv Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ready for the Weekend. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Police and Crime Commissioners

Thanks for reviewing these. I'll come back tomorrow to add sources, because it's late and I've really had enough for tonight. Just a quick note though to say the issue of notability was discussed at length following the first round of elections in 2012. This is Paul (talk) 22:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

@This is Paul: OK. - ElectricController (talk page) 22:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Charles Cassal

Please don't add tags on articles within minutes of them being created. Give the creator a chance to do their job please. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

@Philafrenzy: Sorry, but you could use {{underconstruction}}. - ElectricController (talk page) 23:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Didn't get a chance did I. What are you doing reviewing other people's work anyway? You have very little experience. I would urge you to write more before critiquing other people's work. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

@Philafrenzy: Am I critiquing other people's work? No, I thought I just had the right to review and giving a suggestion. So, if I'm wrong, I apologize. - ElectricController (talk page) 23:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Bay Area Reference Center

You tagged the article as needing reference improvement following its initial creation, when it looked like this. Note that nothing in the article is unreferenced, that there are 5 references, of which only two are to the same work, and that the edit summary reads "Starting article with 2 major refs, some of the shorter ones" - implying that further references are to come. My next edit leaves it looking like this: there are now 4 added references, and information on the corresponding Southern California institution and a further section have been added using these. I hate to say it, but I believe that's pretty good article writing procedure. And it can't have escaped your notice that I have the autoreviewer right: I have no problem with New Page reviewers looking at and critiquing my new articles, or any other fellow editors for that matter, but I don't think it's the best use of your "article curation" time, and I question your judgement in tagging the article as inadequately referenced—in addition to which, you tagged it when new and it soon had even more references. I have accordingly removed the tag and would like to suggest you focus on articles that have had some time for additional edits, not the front of the list, and save the tags for articles a lot more deficient than this. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

My mistake. - ElectricController (talk page) 12:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

I notice that you are new to article curation/new page patrol and from the section above I suspect you may be a bit confused about it. Did you read Wikipedia:New pages patrol? Note the warnings at the top of it. It and the Further reading are the first steps recommended at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/School. The article curation tool is just that, a tool; you still need to be aware of the whys and hows. Philafrenzy also has the autopatrol right (in fact they've created more articles than I have), so both our new articles will have appeared already white in the new pages feed. The reason for that right is to take some of the load off the new page patrollers by "whitelisting", so to speak, articles that are likely ok because they've been created by an editor who's created many articles and demonstrated they know what they're doing; it's ok to look at those, but the ones with the yellow highlight are more likely to need checking. And what you're doing when you decide to place a tag is critiquing—in fact it's criticizing, marking the article as deficient. There's no need to look for a tag to place; if you think a new article is ok, just mark it patrolled (and maybe fix any small problem you see, yourself). People work in many different ways, and new users are more likely than experienced Wikipedians not to realize that they need to have a claim of notability and a reference or two before they hit "Save" the first time, so it's strongly recommended not to work off the very front of the new pages list, so as not to bite newbies and jump the gun on people who were about to fix the problem after their first save. Have you considered doing the New Page Patrol School? It's not mandatory, but there are a lot of things to consider and so it's one of the areas where mentoring from someone experienced can be very useful. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Paint.net 4.0.6 screenshot.png

Thank you for uploading File:Paint.net 4.0.6 screenshot.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marshmello (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marshmello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 02:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CHIP Computer logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CHIP Computer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Userspace circular redirects

A page in your userspace, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Userspace circular redirects and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Userspace circular redirects during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 18:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ElectricController. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)