User talk:Elbasan101

If you leave a message here, I will respond here, unless you ask for a response on your talk page.

This is Elbasan101's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Elbasan101! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 19:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Religion

[1] Ki pake kujdes dhe mos hiq pjesa me references. Please use the talkpage to explain your edits before removing npov referenced data.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 11:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E hoqa se materjali nuk e shpjegon qysh arriten ne conclusion qe shqiptartet nuk praktikojne fene

same would apply to adding rather shoddy pieces of work from a unregistered account. Also I would go as far to suggest that that the "source" is not npov, or at the very least that particular article. The article is not sourced itself no data is provided, there is a lack information how the report gained its info.

Whether or not you agree with it, the statement is sourced. We can therefore state that according to this source (whose credibility is hotly disputed), etc etc. Understand? DS (talk) 23:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The statement is almost the same statement repeated to fit in the article. The actual source (US State Dept) makes sweeping remarks that have no basis. To say that majority is non-religious needs to be backed up. How did they arrive to this conclusion? Did they carry out some kind of survey? Did they work with some organization? etc etc This primary sourcing needs to be established, US state dept is not a primary source.

This is currently being discussed here http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Albania#Religion_for_the_umptinth_time.21 --Elbasan101 (talk) 00:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome.

Mireseerdhe dhe degjoje Zjarrin, pasi e kemi flori djale. Do shihemi shpesh. --Sulmues _talk 02:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mos me keqkupto nuk du te bej sherr. Patjeter do degjoj argumente te ndryshem, edhe do perpeqem te bashkpunjome sebashku :)--Elbasan101 (talk) 11:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ke deshire qe te bashkepunojme per te shkruar kete artikull Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albania#National_Autocephalous_Albanian_Church? --Sulmues _talk 14:14, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gjithashtu, konsidero te shtosh emrin tend ketu Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albania. Pershendetje! --Sulmues _talk 14:58, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man been out for a while, studying!! E shtova emrin tek projekt Albania. A po shkruan artikullin po prap?

Didn't have the time, and I think I'll be editing more marginally than in the past. We need some new editors, such as yourself, especially for Nikolle Marku's Church. I think that should be your article. --Sulmues ^(talk) 01:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]