User talk:Ektar

Welcome

Hello Ektar, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! I know you're not that new but I figured better a late welcome than never! :-) DoubleBlue (Talk) 5 July 2005 15:13 (UTC)

Gary Barnett

You're making solid edits to the gary Barnett page in light of an increase in interest (gary's firing who knows). Keep up the good work!Gator (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i did? :-) i think i've only edited the Katie Hnida page in response to the Barnett firing. but now you're gonna make me want to work on the barnett page. -Ektar 14:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Popes

Oh, please. john k 18:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, please what? Asking for a source is not only sensible but wiki policy. Is there something you don't understand about the policy? - Ektar 18:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit to Todt Hill article

I noticed you took some information out of the article on Todt Hill, Staten Island - about it being the highest point on the East coast south of Maine - that probably should have said on the sea coast south of Maine (see [1]

Sea coast has a pretty narrow definition and Todt Hill is right adjacent to Lower New York Bay. In looking this up I noticed that the Great Blue Hill in Milton, MA, south of Boston, makes the same claim to be the highest point on the sea coast south of Maine, but it's got to be over 20 miles from the ocean, so that seems "inland" rather than "coastal."

I also added a paragraph about the filming of the Godfather on Todt Hill; I provided a reference, alhtough I know this from living at the top of Todt Hill in the St. Francis School at the time the first Godfather movie was made. Revmoran 19:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todt Hill

Good points, good revision - Revmoran 04:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manny Acta

Regarding your movement of information into a trivia section, please refer to WP:TRIV. I have reverted your edit accordingly. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- KirinX 15:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further

To be honest, I was unsure of what would be the most appropriate course of action -- I wanted to call your attention to the WP:TRIV info, but at the same time, I wanted to elaborate on the information in the article and source things out if I could, I just had no time to do the improvements there. I should have just left you a note to begin with.

It is I who should apologize for "ruffling feathers". -- KirinX 23:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan

Well I don't agree with it but it seems to be 2-1 against me on the talk page. I inserted it. Nicknames to me are actual names ie; words. Let's see if anyone else comments. Quadzilla99 17:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded on your talk page - Ektar 17:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, no it's fine. I'd rather just move on. Quadzilla99 18:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pti.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pti.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 16:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked the diff's - When I tagged the image there wasn't a rationale, http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Image:Pti.gif&oldid=139696226,

The rationale you mentioned in your response was added subsuqently by a different user. ShakespeareFan00 10:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Diablo Cody

I responded to your commentary on the talk page [[2]] sorry for the delay. Leave me a note on my talk page. It's hard to follow all my watched pages regularly. Xblkx (talk) 06:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tolzien

It's funny, I was just flipping through comments here after I just un-did Carthage's edit and saw that and when I went to undo my own edit, I saw you had taken care of it, haha. Cheers,--Giants27(T|C) 03:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem... I think we're all a little overly excited about football being back. Ektar (talk) 03:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ektar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ektar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ektar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]