User talk:Ejbsnow

This account is a sockpuppet of Slaine1 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TINCO Investments Ltd. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sceptre ^(talk) 17:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ejbsnow (talk) 17:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TINCO Investments Ltd. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sceptre ^(talk) 20:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WilliamH (talk) 18:13, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ejbsnow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here I would really like to be "unblocked" if at all possible. I understand that my previous submissions were deemed to be too advertorial for wikipedia which was understood. It also appears on my page that there were some attempts made to change the Standard Life page. Although there is no way for me to convince you, this was not me and if this was the reason for my blocking, that is a shame. If not, please could you let me know what the exact reason is for the blocking or was it simply a case that i tried to add a page three times (once by accident - i'm not very good at wikipedia). Thanks

Decline reason:

Unblock declined pending outcome of Bell Pottinger investigation --Jimbo Wales (talk) 16:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ejbsnow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Please could I be unblocked? Or please could you advise me how to get a couple of inaccuracies corrected? Thanks Ejbsnow (talk) 11:23 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Technical evidence appears to show that this account is a sockpuppet of User:Slaine1. If you wish to be unblocked, please post an unblock request at that account's talkpage. This account will remain blocked. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your article submission TINCO Investments Ltd

Hello Ejbsnow. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled TINCO Investments Ltd.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TINCO Investments Ltd}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:07, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]