User talk:Eimukas22

Welcome!

Hello, Eimukas22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vilnius County may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

blank2_info = €15,700 ([http://osp.stat.gov.lt/pranesimai-spaudai?articleId=1887860]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Telšiai County may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

blank2_info = €8,870 ([http://osp.stat.gov.lt/pranesimai-spaudai?articleId=1887860]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eimukas22, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Eimukas22! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Serbia

Hi. Your recent update of Serbia GDP [1] is welcome, but you did not update the source of those data: the reference still points to the October 2014 IMF WEO database [2], and I can't find an update on their website. Per WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, please update the reference for those data as well. Thank you. No such user (talk) 16:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Future GDP

Could you please stop changing country GDP data to 2015? We use historical data, not future estimates. Thanks! -Zanhe (talk) 20:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vilnius-center.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Vilnius-center.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vilnius-city-center.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Vilnius-city-center.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 22:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Belarus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding estimated data to articles. We use historical facts. Jcmcc (Talk) 09:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 5 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ukraine page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Italy

The article about net average wages in Europe you are correcting every day isn't correct.Italian wages are widely higher than the spanish ones.In ISTAT sources net italian wages is 2057€ and the gorss 2538€ in May 2016.I'm redaing just numbers there,not true wages for Italy.In the article the reference for Italy isn't ISTAT that is the official national source but just a common newspaper article.As the Wikiperdia article reports the references must be only official national sites.Not trustble article.151.40.47.208 (talk) 07:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sweden ‎ etc.

It is way too early to change 2016 data to 2017 estimates, please don't. Materialscientist (talk) 07:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have reverted your edits on Sweden since the table of NUTS 2 areas in Sweden that you added to the article doesn't list administrative divisions, just groups of neighbouring administrative divisions (i.e. counties, called NUTS 3 areas for statistical purposes), bunched together for statistical purposes, with no administrative functions whatsoever. Thomas.W ^talk 13:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Polish ,swedish and italian wages

The polish wage on the table is different from the map.The swedish wage is lower than reported.The italian one is totally wrong.Reference Foredirectoy reports the JP statistic (so a private study ) and not the official italian national source ISTAT as it should be (all other states ahve national statistic numebrs.All people in economy know that a net wage in Italy is higher than 2000€ and higher than in Spain(see also relation with net income per capita and nominal GDP per capita)At the moment the article is ridiculous.151.40.49.72 (talk) 13:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GDP

Please stop adding 2017 data to articles - they are just crude projections that don't apply. We still live in 2016. Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Lithuania. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 10:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Lithuania

I don't normally address such things and I have to state first that I find your overall contributions to Wikipedia valuable, but careless edits such as this are unacceptable. Your drive-by edits screwed up two references and formatting of sections. I would highly recommend doing major edits, such as creating tables, in your sandbox first, polishing them, and only then putting the final thing into articles, especially if you're editing from a mobile device where it is easier to make a mess. No longer a penguin (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Partial accessdates

Hi, please note that the various {{citation}} templates now require a full accessdate or cause an error, which if you have viewed your recent changes would have shown in red. Please ensure that a full date is supplied in future. Thanks. Keith D (talk) 19:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics

please use the following format for GDP and other demographics information

| demographics_type1     = GDP
| demographics1_footnotes= &nbsp;(nominal; 2014)<ref>http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7192292/1-26022016-AP-EN.pdf/602b34e8-abba-439e-b555-4c3cb1dbbe6e</ref>
| demographics1_title1   = Total
| demographics1_info1    = €25 billion
| demographics1_title2   = Per capita
| demographics1_info2    = €10,000

this will avoid collisions with the other blank parameters (all the articles you are adding to Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls), and automatically adds the bullet indentation for you. Frietjes (talk) 15:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eimukas22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at South West England, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 12:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have twice reverted your edits to London. You gave no explanation in an edit summary for your reduction in precision. The existing text agrees with the reference, so unless these is a good reason it should remain. The editor above warned you about making changes without citing a reliable source to support the change. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:55, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Yorkshire and the Humber. Warning for unsourced and unexplained change of numbers on multiple articles, not only this one... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 12:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at North West England. Warning for unsourced and unexplained change of numbers on multiple articles, not only this one... - Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 20:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Lithuania has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. – Sabbatino (talk) 12:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Economy of Madrid

Hello Eimukas22. You changed the GDP of Madrid to "€0.2 trillion", but this does not present the figure with enough precision to be useful. A figure quoted as 0.2 trillion could be anything between 0.15 trillion and 0.25 trillion. It would be OK to show the figure as "€0.196 trillion" or "€196 billion". While I'm here, could you please start to use edit summaries to briefly explain the purpose of edits you make. Thank you: Noyster (talk), 13:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow

With this edit you changed the GDP of Moscow to "$30,000 per capita". How did you reach that figure using the source cited? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you added correct demographic date to New York City, but added data for the state, not the city. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have been blocked, but I'll add more information anyway. You changed demographic data here, removing sourced data and leaving only the source "parisregion.eu". Magnolia677 (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your two edits to Dublin were incorrect. The original number was correct according to the source, and you changed it to an incorrect number. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eimukas22, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

No longer a penguin (talk) 12:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eimukas22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wont do this again(create other accounts, but Im really addicted to editing, so if you wont I will create other accounts

Decline reason:

Your threat shows we categorically cannot trust you. You are welcome to come back in six months and request an unblock under WP:SO. At that time, we will verify that you did not follow through on your threat to set up additional accounts in order to continue editing. If you are caught doing so, you will not be eligible for unblock. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:Minimum Wage European Map NEW.jpg

The file File:Minimum Wage European Map NEW.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused map. Low quality. Outdated. No obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eimukas22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was originally blocked because I was using multiple accounts. My first block was like 9 years ago when I was young and new to Wikipedia. When I got blocked I created new accounts. Later after 3 year break I created account name "Radom1967" and used it for editing. I did almost 12,000 edits my edits wasn’t bad as I now understood how Wikipedia works. But later I was banned because administrator found out I was same guy from 9 years ago and was banned. After my first ban I could request unblock but I didint read Wikipedia rules that I could be unbanned. My whole ban is for using "multiple" accounts and not disruptive editing eimis (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser data shows only

Unlikely block evasion (in a good way). However, looking at Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Eimukas22, I think this user is almost certainly considered banned by the community due to WP:3X, so no admin is free to unilaterally lift the block. Eimukas22, see WP:UNBAN for how to proceed. You'll need to deal with your years of abusive sockpuppetry. The above request has no chance of convincing the community, given your chronic abuse. --Yamla (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]