User talk:Egyptian army

May 2021

Your recent editing history at HMS Zealous (R39) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lyndaship (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

51 killed by report from the jewish agency Egyptian army (talk) 19:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.jta.org/1970/05/18/archive/israelis-in-heaviest-assault-on-egyptian-targets-2-israeli-soldiers-killed-13-wounded Egyptian army (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the report Egyptian army (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you believe me because I do not distort? Egyptian army (talk) 19:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, did you see the report? Egyptian army (talk) 19:11, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite that as a reference in the article Lyndaship (talk) 20:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, brother, take on that task. Please, you create the appropriate article Egyptian army (talk) 20:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I authorize you to do this, my dear brother Egyptian army (talk) 20:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have documented it within the sources because Egyptian army (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, can we co-operate? I have a book called Egypt, which was written by the officers for the Russians. It revealed operations that were not mentioned in the article, “War to Exhaustion.” Egyptian army (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Such as the destruction of the frigate weighing 60 tons, and by destroying it, the interference on the Egyptian air defense radar disappeared Egyptian army (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring on the article HMS Zealous (R39) - you are continually altering cited text - falsifying what the reliable sources say - note that the article already states that casualty figures differ, so your continual removal of information sourced to what are probably better sources than a news agency is disruptive and means the article doesn't make sense.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:22, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Jewish news agency that was relied on in the Harb article to exhaust how it is, then, unreliable Egyptian army (talk) 22:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But indeed, this is the correct number of deaths. This is also intentional. I have the agency report Egyptian army (talk) 22:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So rewrite the article and write the dead 51 Egyptian army (talk) 22:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My brother in the Egyptian Air Force is ready. Soon, the Renaissance Dam will be destroyed as we have not reached a comprehensive agreement in Melli Renaissance Dam. Egyptian army (talk) 22:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, get ready for the authentication process, my friend Egyptian army (talk) 22:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, despite your tremendous efforts, there are many things in the article War of Exhaustion that is incorrect according to this quote from a book one day in Egypt for Soviet officers. A quote: The war of attrition that began to require the participation of the fleet also in military operations, despite the role of the fleet - to my knowledge - was very modest, as there was no sea enemy in the full sense of the word on the one hand, and on the other hand the fate of the war on land and in the air was decided. Aviation was the main enemy of the Egyptian Navy. Meanwhile, it is a very intriguing scene. The Egyptian naval forces were doing their work more effectively in the Mediterranean, while the Israeli air forces were responding with strikes on the small fleet located in the Red Sea. The battle of Egyptian missile boats with the Israeli destroyer "Eilat" in the year 19 was widely known. And in the staff building of the fleet, some things were distributed in the form of an exhibition, where everything that could be gathered from the place where this destroyer was destroyed was displayed (I don't know why I still remember a telephone with the words “Rapid”). Among the items on display are the remains of the missiles that sank it, The effectiveness of the missile 'operations has been confirmed more than once, and in the context of the war of attrition, “the Egyptian missile boats sank a huge ship that served as a powerful exit to the jamming operations. By destroying it, the interference on the Egyptian air defense forces’s radar devices disappeared. ” It was typical, as after a few days, news appeared in the Israeli press that the Egyptians had sunk a fishing boat. The raids of Egyptian destroyers along the Sinai coast with the aim of striking Israeli warehouses and sites were widely known, which was recorded in his memoirs by Admiral F.! . Zob, who was then advisor to the Commander of the Destroyers Brigade, personally participated in this campaign. This work was definitely a colossal success for the Egyptian Navy. The Israelis were already surprised by this and at the beginning they decided that subversive groups were carrying out their work on their lands, however the real source of concern was discovered quickly and here the flight took off in the air, the destroyers were discovered and attacked , and at the headquarters of the fleet staff it was decided that all ships were not badly affected (on Although there were wounded among the crews), thanks to that, the aircraft were not intended to destroy naval targets, meaning that they had experience in ground battles. On the other hand, great calamities could have been expected. a Egyptian army (talk) 22:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the same source concerning Eilat, he talks about the sinking of the huge ship in the same text Egyptian army (talk) 22:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.jta.org/1970/05/18/archive/israelis-in-heaviest-assault-on-egyptian-targets-2-israeli-soldiers-killed-13-wounded Egyptian army (talk) 22:49, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The diary of General Mohamed Fawzi was based on the War of Attrition, called the 3 Years War, by General Mohamed Fawzi Egyptian army (talk) 22:50, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is, the huge ship Aurith was jamming the Egyptian air defense radars and destroying them, the interference on the Egyptian air defense radar disappeared. Egyptian army (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I downloaded the book one day in Egypt for free. Do you want the book on Google? Egyptian army (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When will you paraphrase Egyptian army (talk) 23:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Ish, are you there? Egyptian army (talk) 12:23, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits attribute a death toll of 52 to Rabinovich and English - Have you checked those much more recent sources to confirm that they say that - because certainly English, a well respected naval historian says 47. Why are you determined to misrepresent what the sources say?Nigel Ish (talk) 17:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The death toll is 51, according to the agency, my friend Egyptian army (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not lie this according to the same reliable source that I have relied on Egyptian army (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel When do you make edits the article is more reliable Egyptian army (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not trust the Israeli stories. There is an Israeli newspaper that said that more than 47 people were killed, according to another source Egyptian army (talk) 17:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My full respect and appreciation, but you are not presenting the Egyptian Armed Forces as befitting Egyptian army (talk) 17:58, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1) What have dams got to do with a ship built during World War II and sunk in 1967? Why are you talking about it soon being destroyed? Those sort of statements are quite out of place on Wikipedia. 2)You also continue to make Xenophobic accusations about Israeli sources - i.e. "do not trust the Israeli sources" while arguing that your preferred higher death toll is inserted, also based on an Israeli source and dismissing all other sources, whether published in New York or England. Most of your comments seem to be unrelated to the article in question.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:26, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an Israeli source but rather a source from the Jewish Agency Egyptian army (talk) 18:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not make accusations. Rather, you do not rely on Egyptian sources. A huge ship was sunk in 1970 that was documented in a war field to be exhausted on the occasion, but it was jamming the Egyptian air defense radars and you do not know that. Egyptian army (talk) 18:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it is at the heart of the article on the war of attrition Egyptian army (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But you have the right to the Renaissance Dam, it has nothing to do with a war to exhaust it, but I was asking you to prepare only for what is coming before the end of this year Egyptian army (talk) 18:53, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You must rely on Egyptian sources, such as the book The War of 3 Years from General Muhammad Fawzi and many others Egyptian army (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confession: Only two have returned from Operation Bulmus 6

For example, I have a video about the battle of the Green Island in a war to exhaust it. Commander Illumi admitted to the heavy losses and that the goal was to occupy the island and failed to do so completely, and despite that I relied on false sources Do you want to see the video Egyptian army (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not doing what is required. You do not seek to extract facts and narrate them, but only accuse me. You should state the facts without provocation. I do not accuse anyone, but you are provoking many Egyptians because of your love for Israel at our expense. Instead of cooperating with me, you accuse me of why Egyptian army (talk) 19:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then there are many of the achievements of the Egyptian navy, you did not list them or you list them without completing them in the correct manner. You just continue to promote Israel only and you provoke me with a destructive statement built during the second world devastation and destroyed in 1967. This is a provocation. What did you mean by that? Egyptian army (talk) 19:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is the October 1973 war considered the victory of Israel on the Egyptian front in particular, my brother?

How is the October 1973 war considered the victory of Israel on the Egyptian front in particular, my brother? Egyptian army (talk) 20:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it because of the siege of the Third Army? Egyptian army (talk) 20:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 9 May 2021 (UTC) Why is this a dialogue about the October War? You should feel that you got it wrong I sinned because you banned me, and this is a civilized dialogue that requires patience[reply]