User talk:Ee nn yy

Salix cathayana

Hi, I reverted your edits of Salix cathayana and would like to give you 2 articles to look at before doing further edits. First is WP:ELPOINTS that can guide you how and how not to include external links. Second is MOS:OVERLINK that explains appropriate use of links. Aithus (talk) 02:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ee nn yy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Largoplazo (talk) 13:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review of your edits

Hello! I see you've been adding wikilinks to some articles and also adding references, and that's great! Thank you. However, the way you've been adding references isn't correct, and some of them aren't really suitable. I'm looking through your edits to Federal government of Nigeria, and I'd like to walk through those with you.

With this edit, you added an external link. As the guidelines on external linking explain, external links shouldn't appear in the body of an article, but should be restricted to suitable links appearing in an "External links" or similar section at the end of the article.

However, it's clear that you added that external link as a reference, to verify the text of the article, which is the proper reason for adding a reference. However, proper references aren't pure external links: create them following the directions for citing sources. This will produce a superscript footnote link to the reference at the bottom of the page in the "References" section.

In addition, the URL you linked to was https://nigerianscholars.com/tutorials/arms-of-government/executive-arm-of-government/#:~:text=The%20Executive%20Arm%20of%20Government%3A%20Definition%20and%20Structure,day%20management%20of%20the%20state.&text=In%20such%20a%20system%2C%20the,the%20role%20of%20the%20judiciary). When you see a URL that ends in "#:~:text" followed by some text, you should omit the portion beginning with the "#". The purpose of that is to cause some browsers to highlight the text that matches it. It's a courtesy added by search engines to URLs to make it easier for users to find their search keys in the resulting pages, but they aren't a real part of the URL, and shouldn't be included here. The proper URL is https://nigerianscholars.com/tutorials/arms-of-government/executive-arm-of-government/.

With this edit, you added an external link leading to a dictionary definition of "constitution". We don't link to definitions, and we create a reference not to link to a definition, but to verify a definition given in an article if the article gives one. That isn't the case here, because that article's purpose isn't to define "constitution". However, you could have created an internal link (wikilink) to Constitution. That isn't entirely necessary, because constitution of Nigeria is linked in the previous sentence, and that article links to Constitution, but it's useful. However, beware of overlinking, the linking of terms that readers are likely already to know about or that are tangential to the topic being discussed.

I recommend that you take a look at the changes I made to your edits with this edit. I'm going to make other adjustments as well. I see you've made similar edits in other articles—may I recommend you return to them and make similar adjustments to those, once you've read the guidelines that I've listed above? Enjoy your editing here, and let me know in a response below or on my talk page if you have any questions. (For information on using talk pages, see Help:Talk pages. Largoplazo (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that in this edit to Kemi Adetiba, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.weedle (talk) 23:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akinbode Oluwafemi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deputy Director. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iru (food). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I do not know what you are trying to do here, but it violates our style manual and introduces unencyclopedic tone and medical claims that are not supported by appropriate sources. Please ask the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE for help. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Osun River

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Osun River, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Climate and Sustainable Development Network of Nigeria moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Climate and Sustainable Development Network of Nigeria. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]