User talk:Edrick Uy

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Algin Requilman (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

December 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -WayKurat (talk) 05:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Babymissfortune. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A. J. Mandani. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Nuyles, you may be blocked from editing. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]