User talk:EdrevEpac

Problems with upload of Image:Ppc logo(2).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ppc logo(2).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ppc logo(2).jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Ppc logo(2).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sdrtirs (talk) 23:29, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pickup Podcast logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pickup Podcast logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Joshua Pellicer.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Joshua Pellicer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 02:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/EdrevEpac. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Johnny Dzubak ‎| Johnny Dzubak ‎ | Joshua Pellicer ‎ all have almost identical articles, all written chiefly by you. Digging deeper, all you deal with is "The Art of Charm"... this is obvious COI. Please refrain from editing the aforementioned articles while on Wikipedia, thanks. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 19:23, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like...

I've replied to you on my talk page. Mathmo ^Talk 01:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COI

It seems like you have contributed to three articles that all pertain to the company of The Art of Charm. Specifically for the articles of Jordan Harbinger, Joshua Pellicer, and Johnny Dzubak. Please clarify your interests in these page. It seems like there might be a conflict of interest. Handrem (talk) 21:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Interest in The Art of Charm

I've worked with The Art of Charm before and not only have they helped me transform my own life, I've seen them do the same for dozens of other men. My contribution to their Wikipedia articles is a small token of my appreciation for all they have given me. Meanwhile, it maintains a neutral perspective and is reliably sourced. EdrevEpac (talk) 19:04, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordan Harbinger

The article Jordan Harbinger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

COI as evidenced by edit commentary and user logs; reads like an advertisement. Original research, unverifiable claims. "See also" section seems to be keyword-stuffing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 23:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Pellicer

A tag has been placed on Joshua Pellicer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 23:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joshua Pellicer

The article Joshua Pellicer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. Refs are weak.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 20:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordan Harbinger

The article Jordan Harbinger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Refs are weak. Merely appearing briefly on tv does not satisfy WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 20:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johnny Dzubak

The article Johnny Dzubak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Refs are weak.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 20:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Johnny Dzubak

I have nominated Johnny Dzubak, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Dzubak. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Christopher Connor (talk) 02:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jordan Harbinger

I have nominated Jordan Harbinger, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Harbinger. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Christopher Connor (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Joshua Pellicer

I have nominated Joshua Pellicer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Pellicer (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Art-of-charm-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Art-of-charm-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:EdrevEpac/Joshua Pellicer

User:EdrevEpac/Joshua Pellicer, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EdrevEpac/Joshua Pellicer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:EdrevEpac/Joshua Pellicer during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:EdrevEpac/Johnny Dzubak

User:EdrevEpac/Johnny Dzubak, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EdrevEpac/Johnny Dzubak and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:EdrevEpac/Johnny Dzubak during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:44, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:EdrevEpac/Jordan Harbinger

User:EdrevEpac/Jordan Harbinger, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EdrevEpac/Jordan Harbinger and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:EdrevEpac/Jordan Harbinger during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:EdrevEpac/Pickup Podcast

User:EdrevEpac/Pickup Podcast, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EdrevEpac/Pickup Podcast and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:EdrevEpac/Pickup Podcast during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]