User talk:Editorbotwiki

May 2024

Hello Editorbotwiki. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Editorbotwiki. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Editorbotwiki|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Amigao (talk) 11:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a paid user. I think your a paid user. I have edited this page only through proper credible sources, I have not edited it without any credible sources. Information on a party may information change at any time and At the same time, Wikipedia pages need to be changed with new credible sources. As I did. You keep bringing the page back to read but why? Google it and you can see that many things have changed in this party. So they need to be changed in Wikipedia as well.A Wikipedia page must always be up-to-date. And I'm trying to keep the page updated but you're messing with it. Editorbotwiki (talk) 12:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Amigao. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 18:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts. In addition, your contributions do not suggest that you are here to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]