User talk:EditorMakingEdits

Welcome!

Hello, EditorMakingEdits, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Rape in Germany. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! OccultZone (Talk) 12:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

London and the Daily Mail

Can we discuss that demographics research (preferably with an original source and not the Daily Mail) on Talk:London, please? I'm concerned that as written, it's misleading. AlexTiefling (talk) 11:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexTiefling:, I haven't looked but I know that Daily Mail is a reliable source. They really don't make up information. You can explain your issue here, I will see if I can help you. OccultZone (Talk) 13:15, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Mail isn't exactly an unreliable source, but their article was simply a re-tread of the factual content in the earlier BBC article they referred to. The Daily Telegraph - which I regard as being more reliable than the Mail as a matter of course - did the same thing. It's only right that we should refer to the original analysis (which is still a secondary account of primary data from the census) rather than a further POV retread of it. AlexTiefling (talk) 14:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fat burner

Hello EditorMakingEdits,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fat burner for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. cyberdog958^Talk 06:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prostitution in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Environmental issues in Kolkata

Hello! Your submission of Environmental issues in Kolkata at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Environmental issues in Kolkata

On 13 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Environmental issues in Kolkata, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a 2003 study reported that 87% of reservoirs supplying water to residential buildings in Kolkata, India, were contaminated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Environmental issues in Kolkata. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]