User talk:EditingNUPE
This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Bldfire (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
I have indefinitely blocked this account as a Checkuser has found that its editing is technically indistinguishable from User:Bldfire and edit patterns correspond directly with multiple violations of the abuse of multiple accounts policy WP:SOCK. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
[edit]Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 18:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 18:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
User:NeilN I usually assume good faith, but from the edits and reasoning I've seen, when CLEARLY this subject has plenty of material (which just needs to be properly sourced). One quick check on this person and I'v found dozens of credible articles. This subject is not receiving EQUAL editing. Sending to my list to take over. Thank you, but UNACCEPTABLE! EditingNUPE (talk) 18:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- You definitely should assume good faith, the issue could be that they aren't American. I'm English, and a Google search for them only finds a couple of good searches (due to some EU blocking of non-EU sites, or something). Joseph2302 (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Joseph2302 good point. My search has yielded a handful. Being that I've been calling stuff out like this for some time, I'd definitely like to see someone else take main ownership of this article's edits. Maybe you can tag team with someone who can also see them. EditingNUPE (talk) 19:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- There is a large movement that seems like includes pages like this. But interesting article on wikipedia page DIVERSITY. Check it out: [1]
Notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Shenanigans, possible sockpuppetry at Robert L. Gordon IV. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 19:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- ^ WIRED MAGAZINE (March 5, 2015). "Meet the Editors Fighting Racism and Sexism on Wikipedia".