User talk:Eddroid

Brightcove

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Hu12 18:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a BC employee, but I do have a conflict of interest. I have been very careful to maintain a neutral point of view. Anyone is welcome to delete any content that appears biased, but I believe there are enough quality external references to establish notability. The article should exist, even if I'm not the one who should write it. --Eddroid (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Primary sources

Hey, I just thought I would drop you a note in response to your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brightcove. Primary sources are OK for facts that are not disputed like basic company information, etc. For anything else, including establishing notability, you need secondary sources such as news articles. You have done that and that's why the article will be kept. I think what you are seeing here is the (understandably) strong reaction to your conflict of interest. Now that the article is established, I would recommend your walking away from it other than minor updates so more neutral parties can add to it if desired. Thanks! --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 14:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to let it sit for a while. The article was becoming too unwieldy for me anyway. In fact, someone already took my advice and chopped off the 2nd half, so hopefully it's on the way to improvement. I'll keep my edits to the talk page for now and see what happens. --Eddroid 17:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Rhymesayers Entertainment has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 20:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]