User talk:Ecopave

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ecopave (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is absolute no reason wor this barring , our company is a ledgitimate user and hopefully a productive contributor of articles that deal with Asphalt and bitumen in Wikipedia Ecopave 08:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were banned for pushing the agenda of Ecopave Australia for commercial benefit via increased online exposure using Wikipedia. That's unacceptable since your clear conflict of interest is a violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. Your use of multiple accounts to create a false impression of community consensus is also prohibited under the Wikipedia:Sock puppetry policy, so I'm upholding your block. If you wish to contribute to Wikipedia start afresh with a new account that is not named after your company or any products (per Wikipedia:Username#Inappropriate_usernames) and do not promote your company or its products in any way or we shall block your IP address permanently too. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a vehicle for advertising. -- Netsnipe ► 12:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

License tagging for Image:Logo Ecopave Australia.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo Ecopave Australia.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

We are hereby giving Wikipedia notice that Ecopave Australia wishes to "withdraw" the "Copyright" permission that was granted to Wikipedia immediately. The Copyright use is hereby withdrawn on the grounds that Wikipedia has acted in "bad faith" when it requested for the copyright release for Ecopave's article contributions, because soon after the copyright authority was given, all Ecopave Australia article contributions ie, Ecopave Australia, GEO320 and Mastic Roller Hybrid articles including the addition to the "Asphalt" section titled were deleted except for the ones that Wikipedia wanted to keep like this; ( Approximately 2000 million tonnes of asphalt bitumen is used around the world...) . The "Asphalt" article in Wikipedia now contains a section of copyright information from Ecopave's website - ( Approximately 2000 million tonnes of asphalt bitumen is used...) this addition by Ecopave included a Copyright notice at the footer of the page which was also removed by your administrators in a malicious manner. The conclusion that Ecopave Australia is forced to draw from this is that Wikipedia appears to request copyright permission from editors as in this case Ecopave Australia and once such permission is given it allows its selected administrators to block the user while they remove all additions and articles thereby "high jacking" the copyrighted content from the originating authors by making minor alteration. Ecopave Australia also demans that Wikipedia remove all statements made against Ecopave Australia and its administrators or users immediately or Defamation action against Wikipedia will be taken.Ecopave 07:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by spamming. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Guy 12:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The removal of our responce has been recorded and all evidence has been compiledEcopave 07:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have a rather novel concept of "defamation," and of our obligation to let your company use Wikipedia as a free advertising venue, but that's not the point. Due to legal threats in violation of policy, I'll be protecting this page from further editing. Luna Santin 07:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://.ecopave.com.au

--Hu12 (talk) 12:19, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]