User talk:EclecticArkie

Montgomery Park Race Track

• Please, which other page needs to be history-merged into page Montgomery Park Race Track? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Performance chart

I'd love one of your Football League performance charts for Millwall. It'd look great at the beginning of the 'Entering the Football League' section in the article. You can use Millwall seasons as a source for the data, I put a column for tiers. Would it be possible to make the line blue and white, like the Norwich green and yellow one. I think it really makes the data stand out. Cheers mate. BillyBatty (talk) 13:44, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	thanks for making the league position graphics for the premier league! Lkshoe (talk) 03:58, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, EclecticArkie

Thank you for creating 2020 Charlotte Independence season.

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Wikipedia is in serious danger of becoming merely a football statistics site (rant over). Please add some prose to not be in violation of WP:NSEASONS

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 04:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2020 Charlotte Independence season

Hello, EclecticArkie,

Thank you for creating 2020 Charlotte Independence season.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Fails WP:NSEASONS. Will convert to a redirect per NSEASONS until well sourced prose is possible. (It currently isn't because the season hasn't even begun)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 18:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 2020 Charlotte Independence season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Charlotte Independence season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Charlotte Independence season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 21:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2020 Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC season

Hello, EclecticArkie,

Thank you for creating 2020 Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC season.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Note that this fails WP:NSEASONS. If an article consisting of "mainly of well sourced prose" cannot be created, the article should remain a redirect to the team article. See WP:NOTSTATS for more info.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 21:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Note that this applies to all of the recent 2020 seasons articles that you recently created. I'll wait for the AfD to play out before redirecting the rest of them. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 21:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I really like your symbol for Feminist Philosophy, used in the sidebar on the Judith Butler article. Combining the symbol for female with a question mark was so creative and cool. :-)

Tagus (talk) 20:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the kitten, but I can't take all of the credit. That file is just WeegaweeK's graphic on Commons named File:Feminist philosophy.png converted to a scalable vector graphic that provides a 98.8% smaller file that should load faster.   EclecticArkie   (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 OKC Energy FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conor Donovan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 Tulsa Roughnecks FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tulsa Roughnecks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Inter Miami CF season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lewis Morgan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Ligue 2

Hi, I appreciate the work you did on 2020-21 Ligue 2 club season articles. Can you take a look at the current season fixtures? Have a nice day ahead.--Sakiv (talk) 17:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Vancouver Whitecaps FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ismael Kone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2022 San Jose Earthquakes season

Hello, EclecticArkie,

Thank you for creating 2022 San Jose Earthquakes season.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references that specifically mention this team.
This league is not a professional league for Wikipedia sport, soccer in particular. This means that articles about teams in this competition need to meet both NSPORT and GNG, general notability. This is why this article is tagged like so. Lists, Team rosters, Soccerway, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. Best sources are newspaper or sporting website articles about the team.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:49, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Chicago Fire FC II season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ignacio Gutiérrez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, EclecticArkie

Thank you for creating 2022 San Jose Earthquakes season.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:24, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for adding an SVG graph!

Thank you so much for adding an SVG graph of Bath City F.C. seasons, it's really helpful, you don't understand how much I appreciate it.

That being said, I have a few small issues.

1) The tier/level seems to be the same for; "Third Division and "League Two" and; "First Division" and "Championship" etc.. which I don't really understand.

2) With the majority of Eclectic Arkie's graphs, the "tier" column is present, when it isn't, it's harder for the viewer to tell what sought of level the club was playing at, especially during the earlier years.

3) I'm not sure if all the different colours are necessary, it must makes the article look a bit child-like and messy. Shades of /black/grey/white look a bit more clean and professional.

If possible, maybe using a slightly similar format to your other work. If not, maybe I should have ago. But, honestly, thank you so much Joseph1891 11:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words. The charts are definitely a labor of love.

All of the points you raise illustrate why I have been reluctant to delve into non-League clubs. The following notes relate numerically to your 1), 2), 3) above.

1) With all of the leagues added to English football over the last century, it seemed to me that it was necessary to label the various levels by the name of the league rather than simply by "Tier X". With previous charts, the stability of the Football League made it easy to label the levels "Tier 1", etc., and use that as a standard approach. With a non-League chart, visually representing the Southern League, for example, as it was pushed from tier 3 to tier 7 can get difficult to display in a clear and unmistakable manner.

Also, as the chart marches through the years, I renamed the leagues to reflect changes in branding, i.e. the second tier of the League being named the "Second Division", then "First Division" after the formation of the Premier League, then the "Championship" with the subsequent re-branding. Likewise with the Third and Fourth Divisions.

2) It would be quite easy to add Tier labels on an update on the right side of the chart.

3) Kinda relates to a significant extent to 1) above. Rhetorically: How do you help the viewer discern quickly and clearly which tier is which league in a given year? Colors more muted than what are currently in the chart are a definite possibility on an update. The Western League colors could definitely stand to be toned down. Feel free to send suggestions in RGB values.

A chart like this may be a "work in progress" for a while. The biggest hurdle is just getting a chart uploaded to begin this conversation.

Cheers!   EclecticArkie   (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Honestly mate... your work is outstanding. I see loads of big football orientated youtubers use you graphs to show a clubs history etc... some of the best features on football pages because they embrace an illustrate an entire football clubs history (in league positions) in an accessible and viewable form, to be honest, you don't get enough credit for it.

Of course I understand that because there are so, so, so, many English football clubs, big ones at that, being able to "lay-off" on non league teams must be a bit of a relief.

You're probably thinking (maybe subconsciously) "Who even are Bath City?" "Why bother?" which are perfectly valid points to be honest.

However, there are 4 main reasons why I think you should, if possible, have a crack for the Bath City page:

1) The article is currently in review for Wikipedia:Good article status, and hopefully it goes on to become a Wikipedia:Featured article -- that's the plan anyway.

2) Clubs whom have always been on the brink, but haver never played in the Football League, I believe, deserve a graph. I get not making one for non league clubs that have spent the majority of their history in the 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th tiers. But, for example; Bath and Dartford have spent over 30 years in the 4th tier each, (before the creation of the Football League Fourth Division in 1958) and have spent most of their history in the top tier of non league. They are both historically, by far the biggest clubs in the National League South.

3) There is growing interest generally in non-league football within England, especially since COVID

4) Someone has already made one for the club (obviously you know that), But maybe you could use that somehow. I'm not sure if the article could gain Wikipedia:Good article status with the current graph, its just so convoluted, and fails some guidelines.

5) I'm a fan and I'm biased towards them

If you ever get round to it.. making a Bath City F.C. list of seasons in your signature format, would be, absolutely amazing, I don't even think you'd realise quite how much I'd appreciate it... honestly...I think I might be as obsessed with the graphs as you are.

Even though it is unlikely you ever create one, if you ever did, (I actually pray) List of Bath City F.C. seasons is the place to go.. or the existing graph.

I tried to use your advice as well Eclectic but I'm honestly woeful at coding, I'm not even learning to walk yet in terms of code... if found the videos you sent helpful and I downloaded notepad ++, but I don't know how I can actually see what everything codes for...

Anyway. Have a great day, great week, and keep up your magnificent work man!  :) --Joseph1891 (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Absolute legend, I didn't realise you were the one who created the original article before... sorry for complaining, the new one looks amazing! Joseph1891 (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

No worries. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort and the previous version of the chart was an attempt to incorporate some things stylistically that were used on a chart for Barrow AFC in terms of colors, etc. The WikiProject Football group definitely seem to prefer the grayscale charts.

Thanks for the Barnstar!   EclecticArkie   (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Another for luck :) Joseph1891 (talk) 17:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

You did it!!!

Thank you so much, for providing Bath City F.C. with a Seasons chart, it looks amazing!!! Joseph1891 (talk) 17:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

One last request...

Hi again Eclectic, I'm deeply sorry to disturb you. I thank you immeasurably for your contribution to the Bath City F.C. page, your graph is amazing and more than anything I could've asked for. You've always been my favourite Wikipedia editor, just down to the sheer quality of you work, and how dedicated you are.

There are just a few small things on the graph that might need a bit of tweaking.

The section in-between WW1 and WW2 seems a tad messy, I realise the number of teams changed frequently back the - That being said, I think small anomalies are best left out, as it can make the graph look overly convoluted.

-- This will be my last ever request:

1908-1919

• "Tier 3" consisted of 22 clubs

• "Tier 4" consisted of 10 clubs

• "Tier 5" consisted of 10 clubs

• "Tier 6" consisted of 10 clubs

1919-1924

• "Tier 4" consisted of 18 clubs

• "Tier 5" consisted of 10 clubs

• "Tier 6" consisted of 10 clubs

1924-1930

• "Tier 4" consisted of 15 clubs

• "Tier 5" consisted of 10 clubs

• "Tier 6" consisted of 10 clubs

1930-1939

• "Tier 4" consisted of 15 clubs
• "Tier 5" consisted of 8 clubs
• "Tier 6" consisted of 18 clubs

1946-1958

• "Tier 4" consisted of 22 clubs

• "Tier 5" consisted of 18 clubs

• "Tier 6" consisted of 18 clubs

1958-1980

• "Tier 5" consisted of 22 clubs

• "Tier 6" consisted of 22 clubs

1980-2006

• "Tier 5" consisted of 22 clubs

• "Tier 6" consisted of 22 clubs

2006-present

• "Tier 5" consisted of 24 clubs
• "Tier 6" consisted of 22 clubs

I'm pretty sure you've got the earlier years spot on, (as usual) just 1909-1958 seems a bit odd.

Again, thank you so much man, don't think you realise how much I admire your work. Btw Tottenham are my Premier League team so hopefully they do well this season!

All the best to you, again I'm sorry for the hassle, you've been an absolute star, once these things are addressed I'll make no more requests. Joseph1891 (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

I'll do some double-checking. I went through the season pages on the wiki to get the number of teams in the various leagues at the different tiers over the years. Watch for a message from me to make sure we agree about which league was at which tier and the number of teams they contained. My inclination is to convert my spreadsheet into a table and post it here on this talk page.

Thanks for helping to make sure the chart is as accurate as possible.   EclecticArkie   (talk) 17:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure if this help a bit?

I'll try and make a spreadsheet, tbh I've generalised a lot in the statement above, just thought it might be better if the graph was a bit neater

History of the English football pyramid. (For clubs based in South-West England) Extends from tiers 1-7

1900-1921

Football League:

Tier 1: "Division 1"

Tier 2: "Division 2"

Non League:

Tier 3: "Southern League Division 1"

Tier 4: "Southern League Division 2"

Tier 5: "Western League Division 1"

Tier 6: "Western League Division 2"

1921-1922

Football League:

Tier 1: "Division 1"

Tier 2: "Division 2"

Tier 3: "Division 3 (North and South)"

Non League:

Tier 4: "Southern league Division (England and Wales)"

Tier 5: "Western League Division 1"

Tier 6: "Western League Division 2"

1922-1939

Football League:

Tier 1: "Division 1"

Tier 2: "Division 2"

Tier 3: "Division 3 (North and South)"

Non-League

Tier 4: "Southern League (West and East)"

Tier 5: "Western League Division 1"

Tier 6: "Western League Division 2"

1946-1958

Football League:

Tier 1: "Division 1"

Tier 2: "Division 2"

Tier 3: "Division 3 (North and South)"

Non League:

Tier 4: "Southern League (West and East)"

Tier 5: "Western League Division 1"

Tier 6: "Western League Division 2"

1958-1980

Football League

Tier 1: "Division 1"

Tier 2: "Division 2"

Tier 3: "Division 3"

Tier 4: "Division 4"

Non League:

Tier 5: "Southern League Division Premier"

Tier 6: "Southern League Division 1"

Tier 7: "Western League Division 1"

1980-1986

Football League:

Tier 1: "Division 1"

Tier 2: "Division 2"

Tier 3: "Division 3"

Tier 4: "Division 4"

Non League:

Tier 5: "Alliance Premier League"

Tier 6: "Southern League"

Tier 7: Southern League Division 1"

1986-2004

Football League:

Tier 1: "Division 1"

Tier 2: "Division 2"

Tier 3: "Division 3"

Tier 4: "Division 4"

Non League:

Tier 5: "Conference"

Tier 6: "Southern League"

Tier 7: "Southern League Division 1"

1992-2015

Football League:

Tier 1: "Premier League"

Tier 2: "Championship"

Tier 3: "League One"

Tier 4: "League Two"

Non League:

Tier 5: "Conference"

Tier 6: "Southern League"

Tier 7: "Southern League Division 1"

2004-2015

Football League:

Tier 1: "Premier League"

Tier 2: "Championship"

Tier 3: "League One"

Tier 4: "League Two"

Non League:

Tier 5: "Conference"

Tier 6: "Conference North and South"

Tier 7: "Southern League"

2015-present

Football League:

Tier 1: "Premier League"

Tier 2: "Championship"

Tier 3: "League One"

Tier 4: "League Two"

Non League:

Tier 5: "National League"

Tier 6: "National League North and South"

Tier 7: "Southern League"

Not sure if that helps at all?

Anyway I'll go and make the spreadsheet.

Cheers Eclectic

Joseph1891 (talk) 18:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Number of non-League clubs in each league history PDF

Just gone threw all of the leagues (+ The Tiers below and above) that Bath played in since 1909.

-- Hopefully you can read it. By the way "Tier 7" had 22 clubs in it from 2004-2014, and 24 from 2013-14 onwards.

I think its better to discard; tiers 5, 6 and 7 before 1947, tiers 6 and 7 before 1960, and tier 7 before 2004.

So it would be great, and maybe a bit clearer if:

• Tier 5 started from 1946-47 onwards
• Tier 6 started from 1959-60 onwards
• Tier 7 started from 2003-04 onwards (you've already done this)

Thanks again so much, hopefully that's helpful, let me know if it's not. So sorry for being a pain.

I would be amazing if you could do this.

keep up the amazing work man. Joseph1891 (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Here's that wikitable conversion of my clubs/tiers/years spreadsheet that was created by sifting through the years in English football wiki pages:

Tier	Year	1909	1910	1911	1912	1913	1914	1915	1920		1921	1922	1923	1924	1925	1926	1927	1928	1929	1930	1931	1932	1933	1934	1935	1936	1937	1938	1939	1947	1948	1949	1950	1951	1952	1953	1954	1955	1956	1957	1958		1959	1960	1961	1962	1963	1964	1965	1966	1967	1968	1969	1970	1971	1972	1973	1974	1975	1976	1977	1978	1979		1980	1981	1982		1983	1984	1985	1986		1987	1988	1989	1990	1991	1992		1993	1994	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004		2005	2006		2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015		2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022
1	1st Div	20	20	20	20	20	20	20	22	1st Div	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	1st Div	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	1st Div	22	22	22	1st Div	22	22	22	22	1st DIv	22	21	20	20	20	22	PL	22	22	22	20	20	20	20	20	20	20	20	20	PL	20	20	PL	20	20	20	20	20	20	20	20	20	PL	20	20	20	20	20	20	20
2	2nd Div	20	20	20	20	20	20	20	22	2nd Div	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	2nd Div	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	2nd Div	22	22	22	2nd Div	22	22	22	22	2nd Div	22	23	24	24	24	24	1st Div	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	FLC	24	24	FLC	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	EFL C	24	24	24	24	24	24	24
3	SL D1	21	22	20	20	20	20	20	22	3rd Div	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	3rd Div	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	3rd Div	24	24	24	3rd Div	24	24	24	24	3rd Div	24	24	24	24	24	24	2nd Div	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	L1	24	24	L1	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	EFL L1	24	24	24	24	24	24	24
4	SL D2	7	12	12	14	13	16	13	11	SL	13	19	20	18	20	14	14	16	14	15	12	13	11	11	9	9	16	18	23	17	18	22	24	24	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	4th Div	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	4th Div	24	24	24	4th Div	24	24	24	24	4th Div	24	24	24	24	24	22	3rd Div	22	22	22	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	L2	24	24	L2	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	EFL L2	24	24	24	24	24	24	24
5	WL D1	14	13	10	11	12	12		10	WL D1	16	8	9	11	13	10	12	11	8	8	7	8	9	7	7	6	5	5	6	18	18	18	18	18	18	17	18	18	17	19	19	SLP	18	22	22	22	21	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	APL	20	20	22	APL	22	22	22	22	FC	22	22	21	22	22	22	FC	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	FC	22	22	FC	24	24	24	23	24	24	24	24	24	NL	24	24	24	24	24	22	23
6	WL D2	12							8	WL D2	10	9				13	10	8	9	10	17	18	18	18	18	18	18	18	18	13	18	18	18	20	19	18	18	18	20	18	18	SLD1	17	22	21	20	20	22	22	24	24	22	22	22	20	16	22	20	20	20	18	20	21	SLS	24	24	24	SLP	20	20	20	20	SLP	22	22	22	22	22	22	SLP	21	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	FCS	22	22	FCS	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	21	NLS	22	22	22	22	22	21	21
7																																																																																													SLP	22	22	SLP	22	22	22	22	21	22	22	23	23	SLP	24	24	24	22	22	22	22

As time allows, I'll go through and compare the numbers.   EclecticArkie   (talk) 20:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Eclectic, that's amazingly helpful.

One thing I think may make the graph look a bit cleaner, would be to discard; tiers 5, 6 and 7 before 1947, tiers 6 and 7 before 1960, and tier 7 before 2004. Or maybe just have it start from 1921, (When they joined the Southern League)

So it would be great, and maybe a bit clearer if:

Tier 5 started from 1946-47 onwards

Tier 6 started from 1959-60 onwards

Tier 7 started from 2003-04 onwards (you've already done this)

And maybe just have it start from 1921, (when they joined the Southern League)

Perhaps it would be a bit better to find an "average number" of teams that played in the league below/above Bath to make it look a bit cleaner.

-- E.g. instead of 7, 12, 12, 14, 13, 16, 13, 11 for SL 2 from 1909-1914, maybe it would be better just to find an average of 12? (I did the calculation) as Bath weren't actually playing in that league. Do you get the point? I probably sound confusing.

Thanks so much, again sorry for the hassle. Joseph1891 (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

This image is only temporary, I will request for it to be deleted after you have viewed it.

But this is the kind of the thing I was looking for, obviously the number of clubs in each league wasn't quite that consistent, but something as close to this as possible would be ideal.

Thanks so much for your help, really sorry for using your work, but I believe it was the best way to illustrate my point, I will remove the image as soon as you view it.

Bath City League performance 1921-2022

Thanks so much. Joseph1891 (talk) 00:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Maybe if possible swapping the black and white colours round like The Notts County graph? I think it would make it a bit easier to see, I'm so sorry for bothering you, once this is all done I won't anymore. Joseph1891 (talk) 00:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

My concern is our sharp-eyed fellow Wikipedians who really know their footie. For an example, check out my talk page on commons.wikimedia.org under the section entitled "English League football progression graphs". Then take a look at the Aston Villa chart upload on 14 June 2015 to see what the user was pointing out.

The big question is: what would be the feelings of the people who feel a sense of ownership regarding the Bath City wikipedia page? Since over 90% of the edits on the page seem to be yours, is that a group of one? Or might people from WikiProject Football start chiming in?

As always, just let me know what your thoughts are.   EclecticArkie   (talk) 01:14, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes I understand. To address your points: 1) I was not suggesting that you make the number of clubs that consistent, as it’s just not true. Though, I think maybe “finding an average” for some of the tiers may make the graph look cleaner, and more level.

2) I’ve received permission to edit the Bath City Page from people who work at the club, having emailed them directly. 3) It’s pretty much me who has done all of the work on the page for the last 2 months, people from WikiProject Football may start chiming in here and there but have done so very rarely as of yet.

The graph I edited was just the ‘ideal’, but I understand both realistically and based on historical accuracy, it cannot be exactly exactly the same.

So the only things that I feel need changing to the graph, if possible are:

• 1) Not starting Tier 4 until after WW1
• 2) Not starting tier 5 until Bath got demoted. (in 1958)
• 3) Not starting tier 6 until they got relegated (in 1967)
• 4) Not starting tier 7 until they got relegated. (in 2004)
• 5) Finding more of an average, in doing so “levelling” the table, making it look cleaner.
• 6) Change the colour of “Tier 1” to white
• 7) Change the colour of the line itself to that more similar to Notts County’s (white in the middle) Bath have had kits in the past in which they wore a white shirt with extremely thin black stripes, so I think this makes more sense historically as well.

If that’s possible, that would be absolutely amazing. I understand your point about fellow Wikipedians who really know their footy, But I wasn’t expecting the graph to be as consistent as the one I created, as I’ve just edited it on paint3D and saved it as a PNG file. It was only really a “template” to help make the SVG file as much like that as possible. Otherwise, like you said some should look at it, and not see it as being realistic or “truthful enough”. Again, I’m sorry for the hassle. Thank you so much. Joseph1891 (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

@Joseph1891: The seasons chart for Bath has been modified. Check it out when time allows. Family commitments due to the Thanksgiving holiday here in the States had me distracted for several days.

After all of the work on the Bath chart, I decided to join the Bath City Supporters Society. Cheers!   EclecticArkie   (talk) 22:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

You're legend! It looks perfect, hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving! Joseph1891 (talk) 12:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you so much for the time, dedication and commitment that you have applied to the Bath City FC seasons graph. All the best to you. Joseph1891 (talk) 12:21, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

U.S. season articles

Just a little reminder: in U.S. (and parts of Canada), the normal date format is MDY. I've been tidying up some USL and MLS season articles and noticed that many of your contributions are still in DMY. SounderBruce 05:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Celtic FC Logo

Hi,

I see that you were once one of the contributors to the Celtic FC page. who updated the logo for the club.

I'm getting in touch because I work at the club and we're looking to update the logo on Celtic F.C., as the current one on there is incorrect.

Is this something that you could help with if I sent you it over? (It's very similar to what is currently on there).

Thanks,

Jonny

Jonnygeeeee (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

I'd be glad to help. However, since you already have a wikipedia account, you could upload the new version yourself, assuming it's in .svg format.

Just go to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Celtic_FC.svg, scroll 80-90% of the way down the page, and click on the "Upload a new version of this file" link.

Let me know if you have any other questions. @Jonnygeeeee   EclecticArkie   (talk) 02:47, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Great stuff, thanks! I really should have seen that myself. That's a huge help though, thanks. The marketing team will be delighted. Thank you. Jonnygeeeee (talk) 08:34, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

@Jonnygeeeee No worries. That link is kind of buried way down on that page. It doesn't jump out at you by any means.

Being contacted directly by a club is a first for me, especially one as big as Celtic. It's been a blast. Cheers.   EclecticArkie   (talk) 13:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

No worries at all. Really appreciate the help! Jonnygeeeee (talk) 16:30, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Unofficial Tottenham Hotspur taskforce/project

Hello, myself and another user had the idea to try to get a taskforce/project going so Spurs fans can all focus on similar articles or just keep tabs on what other editors are working on.

I made the project on a userpage here and welcome you to add whatever is of interest to you, and we can always add more pages as we need to.

COYS! Christiangamer7 (talk) 02:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)