User talk:Ech25

Bengal Army

Hi- Please read WP:CITE on how to add inline citations. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 18:57, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did, but I miss-understood what you said there, so I re-did it.

18 Squadron

Hi can you please change the title of 18 (Burma) Squadron to 18 (Bomber) Squadron!

I have tried myself but I don't have permission and it was a 'page change'

We were never in Burma, but we have a Bomber heritage.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopGun1066 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid not, that is the title of the squadron, I'm just copying from the book..

Hi, it is not known as 18 (Burma) Squadron now and per page 30 of the same book I cannot see any reference it having been in Burma. I can only assume that, if it was called 18 (Burma) Squadron, that name was used only briefly. It may have been that at some time in its past it had a large number of Burmese recruits. Dormskirk (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly I did make a quick assumption, but I do see your right in it's not referred as that anymore..

Thanks all. Much obliged. (Topgun1066) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopGun1066 (talk • contribs) 08:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blairgowrie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Battle of Carillon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lake George

Yorktown order of battle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello Ech25 and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madras Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2nd Madras Native Infantry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Battle of Bunker Hill into Order of Battle for the Battle of Bunker Hill. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't know that, thank you.Ech25 (talk) 15:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Army Reserve page?

There is currently a page called 'List of Territorial Army units (2012)' which I have personally been adding to a lot, but due to the Army 2020 Refine, and soon to be new reforms, should there be a new page for the "List of Army Reserve units (2020)".? I'll tag some people to have to same interest if you don't mind, as I would like some views before I do make it.. @BlueD954:, @Noclador: @SmartyPants22:Ech25 (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no argument new or new page. Up to you. BlueD954 (talk) 03:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I support the creation, as it needs an update after Army 2020 and Army 2020 refine. SmartyPants22 (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ech25: Do add inline references. BlueD954 (talk) 06:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueD954: I'll see what I can do. Ech25 (talk) 16:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you're messing up again, J-Man11. BlueD954 (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ech25: It's a good start however there are some grammatical errors, some of the information is out of date, and inline references are needed. :) SmartyPants22 (talk) 19:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SmartyPants22: For A Co, 4 LANCS, take a look at: | 2015 Army 2020 Changes Ech25 (talk) 19:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Territorial Army units (2012), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of British Army Reserve Units (2020)

I have been dealing with a number of users, especially JMRAMOS0109, who are inserting material without proper references. This article needs in-line references. You need to provide those references, in-line, in full format, at least to battalion level, within 10 days, or face administrator action. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 20:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buckshot06: Does that mean EVERY single unit? That seems like a bit much.. Ech25 (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Every SINGLE unit. One reference at battalion level, with all the links in one footnote, is fine. We've had problems with other users, notably the unlamented J-Man11, on these British military articles, who skipped on the rules and bothered us for ages. I will not tolerate this happening!! Comply, or face administrator action!! Buckshot06 (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No need to get angry, but thanks for the quick response. One last question, would it be quicker if I moved it back to Sandbox? Ech25 (talk) 21:27, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can do that should you wish. Buckshot06 (talk) 03:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What happened?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ech25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not entirely sure why I was just banned?

Decline reason:

You were blocked over a year ago; it should hardly be a novelty. Yunshui ^雲 _水 06:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

Welp, it looks like a checkuser blocked you as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/J-Man11. Please see the relevant section of the WP:GAB --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 05:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC) Eeewww] --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 05:10, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve British Territorial Army Order of Battle (January 1947)

Hello, Ech25,

Thank you for creating British Territorial Army Order of Battle (January 1947).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for referencing concerns.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: There isn’t much I can do sadly. Had a lot of great plans to improve one eof those pages.. Ech25 (talk) 06:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ech25

Thank you for creating Battalions of the Mobile Defence Corps.

User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This has been tagged for referencing issues.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battalions of the Mobile Defence Corps

Hello, Ech25,

Thank you for creating Battalions of the Mobile Defence Corps.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of British Army Reserve Units (2020)

The article List of British Army Reserve Units (2020) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

First There's not such thing as British Army Reserve""; it is just Army Reserve. Second the references are not up to date. Third, the was created by a blocked user and probably updated by him, Ech25. We don't need a list of units of every year. PROD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlueD954 (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of British Army Reserve Units (2020) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of British Army Reserve Units (2020) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British Army Reserve Units (2020) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlueD954 (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Ech25 unblocked

Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Ech25 (talk · contribs) is unblocked subject to a one-account restriction. Maxim_(talk) 17:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Ech25 unblocked

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]