User talk:Ecenafri

Proposed deletion of Srimaharshi Research Institute of Vedic Technology (SRIVT)

Hello, Ecenafri. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Srimaharshi Research Institute of Vedic Technology (SRIVT), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Righteousskills (talk) 03:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Srimaharshi Research Institute of Vedic Technology (SRIVT)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Srimaharshi Research Institute of Vedic Technology (SRIVT) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Svirt company logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Svirt company logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmarshi Subhash Patri

There has been a thread opened at the Wikipedia biographies of living persons noticeboard concerning your edits to the article on Brahmarshi Subhash Patri. You may wish to comment there, but I suggest that before you do, you familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policies, notably Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not - with particular attention to the section on gossip. Your edits were entirely unacceptable, and have been reverted. Please ensure your edits comply with the policies linked in future. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Ladies Special (film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ladies Special (film). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Bommarillu. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bommarillu – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BigJolly9 (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Parents' Worship Day

I have no opinion about notability one way or the other; my concern is simply that the article is not eligible for PROD, as it has been discussed at AFD previously. Giant Snowman 13:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]