User talk:Ec.Domnowall

Hello, Ec.Domnowall! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 23:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kim Huffman has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjz8StyS1gA (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sea of Japan naming dispute

Hi, I just saw and edited your addition to Sea of Japan naming dispute. I'm concerned about the reliability of that source--was it published in a journal of some sort? Looking at the link itself, it looks like just a self-published article, but perhaps it was published and that info just isn't on the pdf. If it wasn't published in a peer-reviewed journal or similar place, though, I'm afraid that it may not qualify as a reliable source. Let me know if you can. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I was too quick in editing this page: the pdf article seems quite serious, reporting about recent work by the IHO and written by an university professor, and it echoes other proposals from 2006 by the South Korean President (Sea of Peace, Sea of Friendship), so I wanted to add these informations on this page. I forgot that on WP the best is to rely only on published articles in established media (here, I don't know if it is the case). I will be more cautious now. Ec.Domnowall (talk) 00:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If we don't add the "East Sea" name, it would give the impression that the South Korean president used the name "Sea of Japan" during that summit. There must be a wording that could reconcile WP rules and facts. Ec.Domnowall (talk) 01:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP rules on this are not flexible. If we quoted the South Korean President, we would of course use his words (even if we translated them from Korean, we would say "East Sea" if that's the word he used). But, per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean)#Sea of Japan (East Sea) says that whenever we are writing in Wikipedia's voice (which that sentence is), we have to use Sea of Japan. The sentence as written now doesn't imply that he used the words "Sea of Japan"; it merely says that he was talking about that place which Wikipedia calls Sea of Japan.

As for the first part, since it appears that that isn't a reliable source, I'll take it out. I may then consider moving the other sentence to another part of the article, just so that we don't have a really small paragraph at the bottom. I think that we mention other Korean proposed names elsewhere; I'll have to take a look later. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But in this particular sentence, maybe writing "the sea between Japan and Korea" would be simpler? (just like people did at the beginning of the naming decision you forwarded) Ec.Domnowall (talk) 23:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the whole article is about the same sea, I changed it just to "the sea". Does that look like it still makes sense in context to you? Also, I removed the first part; if you do find out that that paper was published in a reliable journal, we can re-add it with a full reference. 23:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

It's fine for me. I've just found another not reliable source (in french, sorry!) saying that in the past the sea had also been called "mer d'Orient" (Orient sea) or "mer de Tartarie" (sea of Tartary, like the Strait of Tartary). Maybe I will add it, if I find a good source. Ec.Domnowall (talk) 00:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--Charles (talk) 17:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In The Kroaz Du (Black Cross), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Brest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Major changes needed on Ukraine war map

I saw you have been doing a lot of the editing on the Ukraine war map, by the way, very nice work. :) I wanted to point out that major changes are needed after today's events. AFP journalists confirmed no Ukrainian Army presence south of Donetsk or along the 100 km highway leading all the way to the Azov Sea coastline, which they confirmed is separatist-held. Starobesheve, about 30km southeast of Donetsk, confirmed by both locals, Ukrainian military and AFP to have been captured by separatists. Ukrainian troops surrounded in Ilovaysk, confirmed by its commander. Source here [1]. Further, Ukrainian military confirmed separatists captured seven villages north of Novoazovsk, while the major of the town confirmed separatists entered the town this morning making it at the very least contested. Source for this here [2]. EkoGraf (talk) 23:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, source now [3] Novoazovsk has fallen to the separatists. EkoGraf (talk) 00:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your appreciation ! I am not directly updating the map now since that version was said on the talk page to be incorrect and outdated (which is possible) and finally replaced. If I find the way, maybe I could upload the latest Russian version (like RobiH).
As for the journalists, since they were in Starobesheve, I would say that the road to the south must have been the one to Novoazovsk, a region where previously there were mostly border guards. But I can't be sure.
Anyway, it's probably better If you ask the authors of that map for changes : they are much faster on the "draw" than me :) Ec.Domnowall (talk) 01:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe ok. :)

Barnstar

		The Instructor's Barnstar
		This Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who have performed stellar work in the area of instruction & help for other editors. For having helped me to start working on SVG files. Your help was very helpful, and I've been learning quickly

Mondolkiri1 (talk) 17:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merci !
It's always an honor to be nominated :) Ec.Domnowall (talk) 01:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macdonald, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dyfnwal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ec.Domnowall. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]