User talk:Ebdick

Speedy deletion of Amir Cyrus Ahanchian

A tag has been placed on Amir Cyrus Ahanchian, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 16:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Amir Cyrus Ahanchian

You removed a tag requesting that information and claims about the subject be properly sourced to reliable sources; it has been restored. Please do not remove such tags without addressing the concerns raised by your fellow editors. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but it was kind of an accident. It was late. I was pretty drunk and confused and couldn't figure out how to put the tag back on. I addressed concerns. Ebdick (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Razor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Razor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amir Cyrus Ahanchian for deletion

The article Amir Cyrus Ahanchian is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Cyrus Ahanchian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 09:53, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Feto Soap

The article Feto Soap has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like a non-notable product produced by a small local business; no evidence of significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lyndal Harrington for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyndal Harrington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyndal Harrington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 22:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]