User talk:EastGermanAllStar

Re Jimmy Wales - Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Thank you. --Tagishsimon (talk)

I'm sorry, it won't happen again.EastGermanAllStar 23:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope not. I've had a look at the rest of your contributions to date. They all seem to be humorous in intent; but that is rarely a good thing in wikipedia. It simply wastes people time. I hope you will stay & make a positive contribution. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Ja, shut up.EastGermanAllStar 23:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet Union

Please stop making joke edits. --Guinnog 17:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No joke has been made.EastGermanAllStar 17:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? You maintain the USSR has been reconstituted, and that the event has been covered in mainstream media? I like a joke at least as well as the next person, but this isn't funny. The next time you do it I am going to block you. Be warned. --Guinnog 18:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serious violations of Wikipedia rules

Hello, I'm writing to let you know that you have seriously violated several Wikipedia regulations in the last 20 minutes. Such regulations include civility, rules against threats, and removal of sourced content without specific reason. I am very concern about these actions and I feel administrators should be held to a higher standard of accountability. I am asking you to stop at this point, and re-read your administrator guidelines, and then I will be happy to not report you to the administrator noticeboard, which, if these actions continue, could get you blocked, a punishment admins are not exempt from.EastGermanAllStar 18:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps that's best actually. You have exhausted my patience and you can now deal with someone else. I'm sad it's come to this but you were warned. --Guinnog 18:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're breaking the rules!EastGermanAllStar 18:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Guinnog, and he has done nothing wrong. is an appropriate warning not a threat. SImilarly, this addition is innapropriate ant NOT cited. Linking to a main page of a website is not a citation. A citation must make your assertions easily verifiable, which they are not. If you continue to be disruptive, I will regretfully be forced to temporarily block you. Please do not add innapropraite content to articles. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours for trolling. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

I have closed your recent RfA early per WP:SNOW on foot of the fact that the "oppose" !votes were beginning to pile up, as well as per your current block and your recent civility problems [1] - Alison ☺ 18:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Wikipedia is not a joke site. As such, I have blocked you indefinitely.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, maybe you can't understand things properly, because you're a damn jap, but you really shouldn't characterise this account as "vandal-only". You didn't even see the positive contributions I made. Why then should my account be this quickly condemned?EastGermanAllStar 17:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your 200 e-mails where you called me a chickenshit were also touching. Also, I'm not Asian.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EastGermanAllStar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please see above, I don't think it is fair to describe this account a vandal-only. I was not aware that joke edits were thought to be that bad. Can't I just be given a "second chance"?

Decline reason:

Comments like "because you're a damn jap" show that you have no intention of ever contributing productively. — Yamla 17:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EastGermanAllStar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See abouve, my opinions should not determine my likelyhood of "coming back productively", which I intend to do if I am allowed to return. To base this entirely on my own opinions goes against neutrality rules.

Decline reason:

Your promise above "I'm sorry, it won't happen again" should have been the end of it. Instead you've vandalized numerous articles, been briefly blocked, and hurled a racist personal attack in the same edit where you asked for a 'second' chance. We're happy to assume good faith, and that was done so. Kuru ^talk 17:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.