User talk:Eaglestorm/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Eaglestorm. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Wikipedia:Vandalism

Could you please explain your edit of Wikipedia:Vandalism at Wikipedia talk:Vandalism? --Bsherr (talk) 01:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Eaglestorm, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Eaglestorm/List of Konpeki no Kantai episodes. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.
Shut off the bot here.
Report errors here.
If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC

October 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Update: no longer in effect. Badge of honor.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Tick Tick Tick (How I Met Your Mother episode) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to The Goat

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

About Madbul

I think you should put your piece of your mind on his talk page. He already said on the Double Up talk page (which I removed) that he already put the Double Up page on this watchlist and threatening to revert any reverts. Please see the diffs. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 00:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I, however, think you should be extremely careful here. Wikipedia's policy regarding Biographies of living persons is absolutely clear; the burden of giving references lies with the person adding the information - even though you just 'undid' an earier edit.

Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion

Chzz ► 12:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Your recent editing history at Pinoy Big Brother: Unlimited shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Alexf^(talk) 15:16, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but why slap me with a warning when Cratiod himself has been so high-and-mighty trying to ramrod his edits when they haven't been declared official yet? He's just basing his edits on what was said by the show host hours or days before the formal announcement, which if I may add also makes him guilty of of using improper edit summaries. IQ137 my ass.--Eaglestorm (talk) 23:24, 25 December 2011 (UTC)