User talk:EWAdams

London Heathrow Airport

Can I just remind you about our policy on No Personal Attacks, your comment about another editor at Talk:London Heathrow Airport was not appropriate. MilborneOne (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then exactly how, where, and when does one appropriately complain about the behavior of another editor? Or is Wikipedia going to remain a free-for-all in which vandals may undo useful work on a whim and some editors seize control of certain articles and prevent anyone else from contributing to them? EWAdams (talk) 18:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Democracy Index. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Spitfire^Tally-ho! 17:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't, so mind your own business. EWAdams (talk) 13:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, EWAdams. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Ernest W. Adams, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. czar 00:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ernest W. Adams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ernest W. Adams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest W. Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Swil999 (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Swil999 (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EWAdams. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]