User talk:EVula/Jan-Mar 2013
This archive contains comments posted between January 2013 and March 2013.
|
"you're coming across as a major jerk"
[edit]Am I? To whom? In how many places? I will not temper my attitude in situations where that attitude is required. In that instance, it was, and I exercised my right to use it. doktorb wordsdeeds 03:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- That is total bullshit. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- You've not answered my direct questions. So you've made accusations without evidence, flouting Wikipedia rules on civility. Can you please familiarise yourself with the important rules on this matter so as not to come across as quite so presumptive and rude? I'm sure you realise the importance of not shouting off accusations without proof. If you need any help in how to use Wikipedia I'm sure you know your way around the Village Pumps and noticeboards. doktorb wordsdeeds 19:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- This edit of yours (and its context) are plenty of evidence in my book. Completely uncalled for. You've got some nerve to follow this up after making such a fool of yourself. 219.79.90.26 (talk) 23:08, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- You've not answered my direct questions. So you've made accusations without evidence, flouting Wikipedia rules on civility. Can you please familiarise yourself with the important rules on this matter so as not to come across as quite so presumptive and rude? I'm sure you realise the importance of not shouting off accusations without proof. If you need any help in how to use Wikipedia I'm sure you know your way around the Village Pumps and noticeboards. doktorb wordsdeeds 19:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't make accusations without evidence; I made a single observation, based on a comment you made (which is in and of itself the evidence). If you don't like it, tough shit; I've got better things to do with my time than to hold your hand and explain the basic tenants of the project.
You were being an ass and I called you out on it; if you want to be upset about it and try to accuse me of not being familiar with the rules, knock yourself out. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't make accusations without evidence; I made a single observation, based on a comment you made (which is in and of itself the evidence). If you don't like it, tough shit; I've got better things to do with my time than to hold your hand and explain the basic tenants of the project.
Uizaretardo
[edit]Hi there EVula! I noticed that you welcomed Uizaretardo. It seems to me that the name is a clear insult, but you welcomed them, so is there something I'm missing or is it okay to go ahead and block the account? Thanks, ceranthor 02:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Nope, block away; I was trying to assume good faith with their first edit (why do I even bother?), and hadn't sounded out the username, so I didn't pick up on that. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Crat statement draft
[edit]Hi EVula
Following the drama at BN, I'm trying to come up with a statement all Crats could agree to. Please take a look, below.
I am quite content to do this onwiki -we have always worked transparently, except where secrecy is essential (ie RTV). I think we should be able to wordsmith a statement acceptable to all, and I think it's an important thing to do.
- In my opinion, this issue has come about through an unfortunate proliferation of documentation: policy, guideline, how-to etc
- I am not convinced that there is community consensus on all of the points encapsulated in those various pages
- I am unhappy at what may be described as some or all of: inconsistencies, inaccuracies or lack of clarity in that documentation
- I do not believe that any of the issues we have faced have been caused by Crats trying to widen their powers
- I would like to see the issues clarified, based on consensus, and for the documentation to be updated accordingly
- I'd like to thank Griot-de for generously withdrawing the rename request
Signed
[crat sig]
Lmk what you think. Many thanks, --Dweller (talk) 13:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I seriously need to reread all the stuff on BN before I properly respond to this, and I just don't have the time right now. (I just got back from load-in for a show, about to pop in the shower, need to eat, and then get ready for a different show tonight) EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikiquote name change
[edit]Hello EVula, thank you for your help with the change. If you wouldn't mind changing my Wikiquote account as you offered that would be great as well. Best regards, Lenny_Kaufman talk 18:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Done EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:11, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
[edit]WikiWomen - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi EVula! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
[edit]- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
Simple English proposal at the Pump
[edit]Hello,
As one of the participants in the original Village Pump discussion about getting the Simple Wiki to the top of the Languages, you are invited to participate in the reopened discussion of the same. Your feedback will be appreciated.
Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
[edit]- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
[edit]- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
Courtesy notice
[edit]I have made the very serious accusation against you of being part of a cabal. See Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Resysop_request. Bring a cheesy grin. --Dweller (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Heh, part of me really wants to be the one to promote her, just to see if it gets pissy people riled up over nothing... EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Me first, me first!! The Rambling Man (talk) 15:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
[edit]- Featured content: A lousy week
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
Darkhorse Theater
[edit]I'm awfully glad to see that you corrected my errors in Darkhorse Theater. I've never been there and know almost nothing about it (although I did meet Shannon Wood when she was running for Senate), so it appears that I'm prone to make stupid mistakes. I semi-adopted it as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GroundWorks Theatre, but I haven't done much with it. It and other articles about Nashville theater topics are in need of attention from folks with firsthand knowledge. Meanwhile, I hope you're enjoying your involvement there! --Orlady (talk) 14:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- If you make it out to the show that goes up in March (Sarah Ruhl's In the Next Room (or The Vibrator Play)), I can comp you in. ;)
If it makes you feel better, you haven't made that many errors, especially considering how few sources there are that can be used. People's Branch doesn't exist anymore, though they did use the space for a while (but towards the end of their run, they performed exclusively at the Belcourt), and the Nashville Shakespeare Festival hasn't performed there in a while (2006 I believe was the last time they were there), despite still being listed on the website as a member company. But again, no sources for that, just my knowledge of the space. I'll try not to make too many edits to the article (COI and all that; I've got my own set of keys to the theatre, plus I'm currently the head of ACT 1), but I can give it some improvements here and there. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)- I won't be in Nashville for a play any time soon, but I sure appreciate the offer! It was a challenge to find sources for this article, so if you know of some good online resources, it would be great if you could list them on the article talk page for use by someone who doesn't share your COI situation. :-) --Orlady (talk) 16:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
[edit]- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers
- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
Done
[edit]I wrote in tree wikis the phrase. See. PedroCoutinho (talk) 15:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
[edit]- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
Editor @ ar.wiki
[edit]Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 20:07, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 01:09, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
Hey evula!
[edit]Hello EVula, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 04:11, 29 March 2013 (UTC) |
- Danke. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC)