User talk:E380f876

E380f876, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi E380f876! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Comment

You may find the following link to be of your interest: [1].--Asqueladd (talk) 18:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Asqueladd:. Thank you for your notification. E380f876 (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reported

Reported at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editor, cheers ^†Basilosauridae ❯❯❯Talk 01:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. RickinBaltimore (talk) 01:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

E380f876 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my only account. How have you reached to the conclusion I am the same user as Filiprino? I don't understand how you can close accounts so easily and without possiblity of re-opening them. You are just removing any contribution from my part, or impeding me doing an Rfc for the article Miriam Tey. Anyhow, you blocked me for sockpuppetry, not for illegitimate use of an account. E380f876 (talk) 01:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:21, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

E380f876 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I continue to state that this is my only account. I am in no way connected with Filiprino. This Internet connection is shared by many people. I am sorry if this makes you think I am another user considered to be harmful for Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I have reviewed the checkuser data - your account is Technically indistinguishable from that of Filiprino. Given the crossover in areas of interest as well as the technical data, simple denial is not going to get you unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:59, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

E380f876 (talk) 03:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]