User talk:Dweeby123

contact WP:BASC by email if you wish to appeal further 19:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for You've been repeatedly asked and warned to stop referring to edits you disagree with as "vandalism". These continued personal attacks fall afoul of our no personal attacks policy, and also demonstrate a lack of understanding of the collaborative Wikipedia process. All you need to do to get unblocked is to engage in dialog. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:14, 10 October 2010 (UTC). If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text

{{unblock|I am really really sorry, okay you win I promise to stop using twinkle, please guys just one more chance I'm begging you please, I am truly truly sorry —Dweeby123 16:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)}}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dweeby123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really really sorry, okay you win I promise to stop using twinkle, please guys just one more chance I'm begging you please, I am truly truly sorry —Dweeby123

Decline reason:

Per conversation here and at WP:ANI, and your apparently resorting to some truly lame sockpuppetry to evade this block and advocate for yourself Beeblebrox (talk) 18:50, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dweeby123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am hereby requesting that my block be lifted as I feel I wasn't given a chance, to correct my mistakes which were every edit that an - annon user made I thought them to be WP:VAND, However if I do get unblocked I have promised and am promising never to assume Vandalism again. —Dweeby123

Decline reason:

Having read everything above AND everything below, I see massive communications problems, massive misunderstanding of even the most basic of policies, and a lower than basic level of WP:COMPETENCE. I believe that you mean well, but you really need to take the time that's left in your block and re-read everything, starting at WP:5P and following every link you find. Promising never to use Twinkle again is a good start, but there's so much more you need to know about editing here (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dweeby123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please may I return??, I'm sooooooo bored please believe me people I have learnt my lesson honest and I have changed honest Dweeby123

Decline reason:

I find it hard to believe you've learnt your lesson so fast considering you were sockpuppeting less than a week ago Jac16888 ^Talk 15:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2011

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dweeby123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing this to ask, that I be unblocked I am very sorry for my previous edits and attitude on here but all I am asking is that I be allowed back to edit again once again, I have very much learnt my lesson and taken heed of all the rules and regulations of Wikipedia, as I said all I am asking is for someone to please give me one Final chance to prove myself, I know It will be hard for anyone to trust me but I hereby promise I Will Never go back on my word, one more chance is all I am asking Thanks in advance —Dweeby123 09:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Noting the observation below, you appear to have integrity issues which will prevent us from simply "trusting you". Since you vowed to skirt your block through sockpuppetry, and have lived up to that promise, I see no reason to unblock you. I would suggest going a minimum of six months without evading your block before any future requests are made. This appears to be your fourth declined unblock request; another inadequate request may result in the locking of this page. Kuru (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: Editor has continued to edit without logging in, as recently as five minutes before this request. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 13:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In case it hasn't already been noted, I'd like to point out that Dweeby123 is in fact a sockpuppet of User:WJH1992, who was indef blocked in February 2008, and that account is in turn suspected to be a sockpuppet of User:Dodgechris. –anemone projectors– 15:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dweeby123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing this to ask, that I be unblocked as requested to in March I have observed a 6 month hiatus of not appealing this block, I apoligise for the way I behaved, I understand that I deserverd to be blocked at the time and I realise I was very stupid, I am very sorry for my previous edits and attitude on here but all I am asking is that I be allowed back to edit again once again, I have very much learnt my lesson and taken heed of all the rules and regulations of Wikipedia, As I said all I am asking is for someone to please give me one Final chance to prove myself, I know It will be hard for anyone to trust me but I hereby promise I Will Never go back on my word, one more chance is all I am asking Thanks in advance —Dweeby 123 15:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Also note that additional unblock requests which fail to address the above will likely result in the removal of your ability to edit this page. —DoRD (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.