User talk:Duryodhn

I hope here will be a talk

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Mkbdtu (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—SpacemanSpiff 14:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Duryodhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why have i been blocked, i did nothing wrong, i am a new user on wikipedia, if i have done anything wrong then i will try to improve,please guide me too, i hope some one will give me nice instructions so that i may contribute in a better way to wiipedia, thank you

Decline reason:

At Wikipedia, you only need one account. If you think you've solved the problems fully that made your block necessary, you can appeal the block at your original account- but be aware that, because the use of multiple accounts is so dishonest, people who do that are rarely unblocked. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Duryodhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have no account other than this, i have already said that i am new on wikipedia, but i think a new user is welcomed in this manner on wikipedia, i made constructive add to mahabharata article, see my addition first, if i have done anything wrong than say me otherwise no new user will dare to make an account on wikipedia, i promise you that if i have given rules booklet and some instruction, i will not repeat my mistakes an i will contribute to wikipedia to make it good as such as possible,thank you

Decline reason:

You are lying. You created this account at 20:28 on April 18, 2010. One minute later you created User: Drupada . Two minutes later you created User:Bhagdatt. Eight minutes earlier, you'd edited anonymously and contributed spiff is a baastard,a fucked biitch,listen one thing you cannot stop me from editing on wikipedia,understand,bastard,mother fuccker,biitch,dog,pig. Checkuser verified sockpuppet of banned user. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Duryodhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

as you said above , i want to tell you that we work on a shared network, it is possible that my ip may be same with any banned user for a while. see it is huge complaint from me and some of my friends that whenever any IP from ours network creates account on wikipedia and try to edit any vedic article, he get blocked soon by spaceman spiff as a sock of mkbdtu every time, we all can chat you on phone or gmail simontaneously to prove that we are different.so please tell us solution to avoid this block by spaceman spiff, because it is a monopoly of some administrators, please stop this

Decline reason:

And you have just proven that you are a sock - mkbdtu has a fixation on Spiff, one which an innocent user most certainly would not have. Unblock declined. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 05:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Duryodhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected administrators,,i request you to give me last chance as a editor because ,i have understood that why i was blocked and i shall never repeat my mistakes , i will not continue to cause damage or disruption, give me last chance, i will keep my promise , i will make useful contributions to help wikipedia. so, please unblock my account, give me last chance,i will give a lots of contribution to wikipedia,thank you

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please bear in mind that further abuse of this template will result in removal of your talk page access. -FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.