User talk:Dunny831

Talk to me

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet Investigations/Nkon21

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet Investigations/Nkon21, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 01:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet Investigations/Nkon21

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet Investigations/Nkon21, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Username⁶⁸⁹² 01:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet Investigations/Nkon21. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Username⁶⁸⁹² 01:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. Username⁶⁸⁹² 01:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet Investigations/Nkon21.

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet Investigations/Nkon21., to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Username⁶⁸⁹² 01:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet Investigatiens/Nkon21

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet Investigatiens/Nkon21, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thegreatluigi (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 01:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dunny831 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There seems to be a misunderstanding here. Commenting at WP:AFD discussions isn't vandalism. I was blocked because Nkon21 started a vicious edit war with me, reverting everything I did. I only attacked him because he wouldn't stop harassing me. How else are you supposed to deal with these guys? Dunny831 (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is now a checkuser block. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 05:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your account has only been active for 8 hours and you already been in an edit war, tried to close AfDs and launched a bad faith sockpuppet investigation into longstanding editors. This isn't a misunderstanding, you've been identified as a vandalism account. Attacking other editors is never an acceptable option. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Well, it isn't my fault. Nkon21 started reverting my edits without even telling me. Again, I'm going to ask: How do you deal with someone that reverts your edits with even telling you on your talkpage? They're just trying to have it their way and will do anything to get anyone who gets in their way blocked. This is what happened to me. Dunny831 (talk) 02:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you're really interested in resolving this and you want to take a more mature approach, you can contact me by email. Thanks for understanding. Dunny831 (talk) 02:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever edited as an IP address or with other accounts before? It is very suspicious that a new account would open up an SPI and accuse admins and other highly trusted members of sockpuppetry. Goose^(Talk!) 03:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]