User talk:DukeofLancaster95

November 2022

Hello, I'm Aaron Liu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Soumaya Akaaboune have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Aaron Liu (talk) 16:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

they were true and relevant DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 16:27, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Larry Hockett (Talk) 01:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what I said was true, Larry DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 15:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Larry Hockett (Talk) 15:43, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

his nationality was American

his occupation was philosopher

and i'm a reliable source DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 16:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:37, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what have I done, and who the hell are you? DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 20:50, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you said the reason for my block is "trolling"

so to you, trolling means saying things that are true? DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DukeofLancaster95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

the information I gave was true DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:TRUTH. --Yamla (talk) 22:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am a reliable source DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. See WP:RS. --Yamla (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship to the blocked account, Creepy Lobster? --Yamla (talk) 22:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Creepy Lobster. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 22:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did use a second account, to give information that is objectively true

I did nothing wrong on either account, except refusing to cite articles from establishment media toadies DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 00:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to use a second account to evade a block. See WP:EVADE, WP:SOCK. Blocks apply to the person, not just the account. You are blocked, not just two of your accounts. --Yamla (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocked for doing nothing wrong? Or are the people who blocked me too stupid to understand what they even read? DukeofLancaster95 (talk) 08:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #66524

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]