User talk:Dukefalcon2008

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Dukefalcon2008, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --TeaDrinker 02:18, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Express destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not leave false information

Please do not leave false information in a Wikipedia page like you did with Once Upon a Time in High School. This site has a bad enough reputation for false information already, why would you make it worse? 142.161.251.61 (talk) 21:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate the ability for us to be able to contribute to the Wikipedia community, it would be greatly appreciated if false accusations were not made, especially in a public forum. After watching the movie multiple times in Korean, the original language in which it was produced, the article was updated with the correct plot ending. It is substantiated by online videos, reviews, and websites, such as the following - http://kungfukingdom.com/once-upon-a-time-in-high-school-movie-review/. In addition, others have attempted to update the article with the proper ending, only to be reverted back without proper documentation. Therefore, I will step away from the discussion and the article itself for now but thought it was necessary to clarify my position on my talk page in the face of an accusation that does not hold true. Dukefalcon2008 (talk) 06:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've been fooled this entire time. Believe it or not, it's the truth. That version you've watched multiple times was the alternate ending version. Only I've seen the real and far more logical ending and you continue to defend your ignorance about that. All the websites are blatant lies, and the so-called "proper" ending has always been reverted for good reason; because said "proper" ending is, like I said, an insignificant alternate ending. Those people who reverted, they've seen the real ending and only they know the truth. You think you're being falsely accused, but guess what my narcissistic thick-headed little friend, that accusation is one million percent truth. I have, once again, corrected the page to the one with the true, honest, legitimate ending, and please, for Christ's sake, don't ever touch that page again. 142.161.251.61 (talk) 22:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, there is a false accusation written stating that I touched the page. I have not touched the article since the revert of my edit (I always log in for edits to provide documentation of my work, which others fail to do), and since this is the second time a false accusation has occurred on my talk page from the same IP address, I will give one final request to stop the attacks before contacting an administrator. Wikipedia is a community page that appreciates contribution but requires documentation. Making a claim that all other websites are blatant lies and that you yourself have seen a real and far more logical ending constitutes original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research). In addition, you used terms like "narcissistic" and "thick-headed little friend" in your conversation to me, which are considered personal attacks and not related to the article discussion at hand. Please refrain from continuing in this practice (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks). I understand based on forums online that many were disappointed with the known ending and would have preferred the ending you are stating, but unless you can demonstrate from independent sources that this ending exists, the synopsis in question cannot be used within Wikipedia without independent verification. Wikipedia is not an opinion forum but an open editable encyclopedia that requires documentation (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources). Dukefalcon2008 (talk) 02:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dukefalcon2008. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dukefalcon2008. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Just WACH - WACH Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Just WACH - WACH Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]