User talk:Dufourp

I'm a watch collector and an admirer of Mr. Dufour. I am in no way affiliated to his work or have conflict of interests while writing this article.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philippe Dufour (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more news sources indicating how the watchmaking industry and the general public has viewed his career and work. If it is art, has any of his work been displayed at notable museums and exhibitions?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philippe Dufour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Philippe Dufour, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:09, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dufourp! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:09, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philippe Dufour has been accepted

Philippe Dufour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Serious Warning

This is a serious warning that you have violated the Wikipedia policies WP:PERSONALATTACKS and WP:HTBC by involving in personal attacks and saying some non-sense on my Talk Page. I reserve all rights to file a report to the administrators anytime and you account is subject to being blocked. This is in addition to the warning of edit war that I have given you before, which could also lead to your account being blocked. For now you may continue to propose your revision in Lange's Talk Page, but, once and for all, let me make it very clear that it doesn't matter what your personal opinions are or how arrogant you are in real life, in Wikipedia you have to follow the rules. OxbridgeGate (talk) 19:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]