User talk:Dudley Miles
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Yo Ho Ho
[edit]
Doug Weller talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.
TFA
[edit]![]() | |
story · music · places |
---|
Thank you today for Cyfeilliog, "a bishop in south-east Wales in the time of Alfred the Great. He is best known for having been captured by the Vikings and ransomed by Alfred's son Edward the Elder for the large amount of forty pounds of silver."! - Happy new year! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda. Happy new year. Dudley Miles (talk) 13:31, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! - Liebster Immanuel, Herzog der Frommen, BWV 123, my story today 300 years after the first performance, is up for GAN. Dada Masilo will be my story tomorrow. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- ... and today, pictured on the Main page, Tosca, in memory of her first appearance on stage OTD in 1900, and of principal author Brian Boulton. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Today, between many who just died, Tobias Kratzer on his 45th birthday who was good for an unusual DYK mentioning a Verdi opera in 2018, - you can see his work in the trailer of another one that I saw, and my talk page has a third (but by a different director). 2025 pics, finally. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Today I have a composer (trumpeter, conductor) on the main page who worked closely with another who became GA yesterday, - small world! To celebrate: mostly flowers pics from vacation ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Æthelbald, King of Wessex
[edit]you reverted my edit: why “the bequest to the 2nd, 4th & 5th son” only, and not “to the 3rd son” as well? Jan Hejkrlík (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- That is not known but historians assume that Æthelberht was provided for separately in Kent. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- how could he have been overlooked? that makes no sense: he was the second one in line of succession and, at the end of the day, he succeeded his father; is there any act, deed or charter, in which the 2nd, 4th & 5th sons are named and the 3rd one is expressly omitted? Jan Hejkrlík (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. It is a provision in Æthelwulf's will, as recorded in the premable to Alfred's will. We have to go by that whether or not you think it makes sense. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- how could he have been overlooked? that makes no sense: he was the second one in line of succession and, at the end of the day, he succeeded his father; is there any act, deed or charter, in which the 2nd, 4th & 5th sons are named and the 3rd one is expressly omitted? Jan Hejkrlík (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
TFA blurb?
[edit]Hi Dudley. Edward the Martyr is up for TFA in March. Do you fancy having a go at a draft blurb? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks Gog. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
his is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 18 March 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which will be available once written at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work! Wehwalt (talk) 15:35, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Mentoring for FAC
[edit]Hello. I plan to nominate Mother Solomon for FAC soon. She was a Native American woman forced into Kansas by the Indian Removal Act. Eventually though, she resettled in Ohio and lived out as a nanny and cultural activist. You were listed on WP:FAM, and I wondered if you would be interested in helping with preparation. If you aren't, no worries! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- I suggest that you nominate the article for peer review and ping me. Then other people as well as me can comment. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- I've nominated it. Thanks. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 18:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Dusky dolphin FAC
[edit]Hello. Will you review it again. LittleJerry (talk) 23:35, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

The page Ledgers Wood has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:
WP:G7, author requests deletion, or author blanked – Special:Permalink/1279446832
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:36, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
TFA again
[edit]![]() | |
story · music · places |
---|
Thank you today for Edward the Martyr, about "the latest of my nominations of Anglo-Saxon kings. Edward was regarded as a saint in his own time because the murder of a king was considered an unforgivable crime, and his feast day is still listed today by the Church of England, but he could not be more unworthy of the designation. Historians regard him as "an obnoxious teenager who showed no evidence of sanctity or kingly attributes"."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:23, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Terrific article. Tenpop421 (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Many thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Today: an opera, 100 years old OTD, on Bach's birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:27, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Today, 300 years of Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1! We sang works for (mostly) double choir by Pachelbel, Johann Christoph Bach, Kuhnau/Bach, Gounod and Rheinberger! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- Many thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:58, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent reverts at this article.
Please see WP:NAMB: "It is usually preferable not to have a hatnote when the name of the article is not ambiguous." This is a widely-accepted editing guideline. Why do you think an exception should be made in this case? 162 etc. (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- I do not agree that it is widely accepted. I did not add this particular hatnote, but I have added dozens myself and seen countless others, and no one has queried it before to my knowledge. See for example Edward III of England, Victoria Park, Tower Hamlets and Edward the Martyr. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- My question remains: Why do you think an exception should be made in this case? There is no realistic scenario where somebody seeking the Hamilton neighbourhood would arrive at the Ainslie Wood, London article. 162 etc. (talk) 22:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Certainly there is. It is very easy to click on Ainslie Wood without noticing that you are clicking on the wrong one. I have made similar mistakes many times. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Trying to anticipate user error is no reason for a hatnote. See WP:HAT. I firmly believe that our editing guideline should be followed. 162 etc. (talk) 23:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- You have asked for a realistic scenario and I have supplied one, but you now find a different reason. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules applies in this case. However, the particular case is so obscure that I will not pursue the matter further. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- Per the above, the hatnote has been removed. 162 etc. (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- You have asked for a realistic scenario and I have supplied one, but you now find a different reason. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules applies in this case. However, the particular case is so obscure that I will not pursue the matter further. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- Trying to anticipate user error is no reason for a hatnote. See WP:HAT. I firmly believe that our editing guideline should be followed. 162 etc. (talk) 23:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Certainly there is. It is very easy to click on Ainslie Wood without noticing that you are clicking on the wrong one. I have made similar mistakes many times. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- My question remains: Why do you think an exception should be made in this case? There is no realistic scenario where somebody seeking the Hamilton neighbourhood would arrive at the Ainslie Wood, London article. 162 etc. (talk) 22:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)