User talk:Ds.andreas

Welcome!

Hello, Ds.andreas, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Giant Snowman 13:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Donaldson Sackey, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Giant Snowman 13:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt does not confirm what you are claiming with regards to playing stats, please stop adding unreferenced information to articles about living people. Alternative sources welcome. Giant Snowman 15:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I very much doubt your claims, so I have started a discussion over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Transfermarkt - please join in. Giant Snowman 15:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop persisting in adding unsourced material, the information you have claimed exists is not available even to members, also transfermarkt isn’t considered a reliable source. You have been asked to join the discussion here so please do so rather then re-added the aforementioned info for which you will be banned. Regards (★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★) 20:50, 21 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Donaldson Sackey

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. (★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★) 20:39, 21 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]