User talk:Drunkeniamseeingstars
January 2012
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 02:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Drunkeniamseeingstars (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This isn't a "vandalism-only account". I asked a genuine question on the Ref desk, which was reverted. I presumed that's because it's on my uni IP address, so I made an account. It was still reverted, and on my talk page I was told to stop vandalising. I responded to that user, User:Calabe1992, who ignored me. And responded again when he and another user continued to vandalise my question. Then I find myself blocked. [The question] wasn't against Ref desk rules, it wasn't rude or offensive, it was a genuine question about oral sex. And it's is one that I do not know the answer to, and would like to know. Alexf appears appears to have not looked at my edits when blocking me, to see that I tried to communicate with the people reverting my edits, and he clearly can't have read the question, because it wasn't vandalism in any way. Drunkeniamseeingstars (talk) 02:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Question was inappropriate, repeated reinstatement was disruptive. Commentary on talk page indicates trolling. Talk page access revoked. Drmies (talk) 03:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.