User talk:DrowningEnglish
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]Hello! DrowningEnglish,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! DoctorG (talk) 18:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
|
September 2017
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Magicians of the Gods
[edit]Hi DrowningEnglish. Thanks for your email about Magicians of the Gods. I hope you don't mind me replying here, since it's about an on-wiki matter.
I added the {{POV}} tag for two reasons. One, because of the synopsis section, which presented Hancock's claims as if they were fact (or at least plausible facts). I've rewritten that section so that isn't so much of a concern anymore. But also, the article as a whole does not include any sceptical criticism, which is a problem when the book is pseudoscience. Our approach to "fringe" topics like this can be found at Wikipedia:Fringe theories. In short, it's vital that they are presented neutrally in relation to the mainstream consensus in the relevant field, and that articles on fringe theories do not inadvertently end up using Wikipedia's voice to promote or lend legitimacy to the theory.
I removed the second review because it was from a fringe website (Ancient Origins) which we don't consider a reliable source. Wikipedia articles should only contain information from reliable sources.
Overall it's not a bad article at all, I just think it needs a little work to bring it into line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Joe (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)