User talk:Drisha herjee

Welcome!

Hi Drisha herjee! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 05:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

user historianalfredo is engaging in vandalism, please check ahir clan article, I have provided University of Chicago books Drisha herjee (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

- Ratnahastin (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- Ratnahastin (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

'Vandalism' has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia, see WP:VANDAL to know what exactly it is. The edits you are calling as vandalism are in fact not vandalism(WP:NOTVANDAL)[1][2]. - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree the user HistorianAlferedo is using British Raj sources

The user HistorianAlferedo has removed contents from university of chicago, JN university, london school of economics, Oxford

removing edits which follow Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia is vandalism Drisha herjee (talk) 02:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOTVANDAL, repeated aspersions of vandalism may be perceived as personal attacks. - Ratnahastin (talk) 03:01, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caution: Regarding caste articles

Since you are aware of contentious topics, please be careful with not just your edits related to caste articles, but also your statements on the talk pages. In case of dispute, be civil and use the article talk page in order to arrive at consensus. If it doesn't work, I mean discussion, you may go to WP:DRN! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ekdalian, the user HistorianAlferedo is removing academic contents repeatedly, and also user HistorianAlferedo is making edits with raj sources of 1900 which are not reliable sources

kindly look at the edits and reference I have put they are all academic sources from universities Drisha herjee (talk) 17:54, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]