User talk:Drfred55

Welcome!

Hello, Drfred55, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Neutrale Person (talk) 21:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 12:54, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drfred55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I attempted to create an article about a new and notable company that's received extensive coverage in the swimming and tech media in an encyclopedic style with extensive references. It seems some editors took issue with the slant of the article, which I would have been happy to address to be more neutral (although I tried my best to do so to begin with). I care about Wikipedia and, if you look at my edit history, I think you'll see that the claim that my account exists solely for promotional purposes is simply untrue--unless seagulls are somehow a commercial product.Drfred55 (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The article look quite promotional. We can only unblock you if you promise not to write promotional article again (that means not towrite about that company, its founder and his other companies at all). Vanjagenije (talk) 09:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you have any association with this company whatsoever? Any particular reason you didn't edit for about six years? 331dot (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I bought and use their goggles, and I think they're a neat product. That's about it. As for not editing for six years, the simple answer is that I forgot my password (switched from Chrome to Safari and lost the saved password, and my old email no longer worked), so I've been editing anonymously. I made a final (successful) attempt to recover the password before creating the FORM article because I didn't want Wikipedians to think I was an anonymous shill. I guess that backfired! Honestly, I appreciate that Wikipedia needs to take a hard line on spammers and shills, and I concede that I could have written the "reception" section in a more neutral tone by highlighting more negative points. But I'm a bit shocked that the article got deleted and my account got blocked overnight without anyone giving me a chance to make changes. Drfred55 (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This has "paid article" written all over it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, thanks for that enlightened analysis. Look, I wasn't paid. I modeled the article after the one for the founder's previous company Recon Instruments, which has been up for years and has no tags on it. I'm not sure why my article doesn't pass muster but that one does... Drfred55 (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FORM Athletica

Hello, Drfred55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FORM Athletica".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]