User talk:Drama123

Welcome!

Hello, Drama123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Love of Passion, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Love of Passion

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Love of Passion, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maltese Lion

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Maltese Lion, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Manway (talk) 09:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asian Dramatic Programming

The article Asian Dramatic Programming has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic, original research, unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 08:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winter by U.S state

The article Winter by U.S state has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced original research; narrowly defining "winter" as whether or not it snows but overly generalising as to whether it does or not.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winter by Canadian Providence

The article Winter by Canadian Providence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced original research; narrowly defining "winter" as whether or not it snows but overly generalising as to whether it does or not.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I42 (talk) 23:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winter by Mexican State

The article Winter by Mexican State has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced list of subjective weather definitions. A list for list's sake.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 15:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Chimpanzee has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. LinDrug (talk) 04:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Federally recognized tribes by state. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. -Uyvsdi (talk) 06:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Bahamas. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SamEV (talk) 03:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Laisha-wilkins300x350.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Laisha-wilkins300x350.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 23:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Page3 blog entry60 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Page3 blog entry60 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 20th century, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your repeating changing of the dates of centuries and millennia is getting old. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Indian mammals

I have nominated List of Indian mammals, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian mammals. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shyamal (talk) 02:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of television genre's

The article List of television genre's has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dublicated/enlarged information being already present at List of genres#TV genres. No separate article needed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Zhernovoi (talk) 22:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain the apostrophe in the title. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Chile, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 20:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto Argentina etc. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 20:27, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Telenovelas

Many redirects you have made are listed in request for deletion. Check Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 June 27#Telenovelas MBelgrano (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Chihuahua (dog). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 01:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at England, you may be blocked from editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rettens2 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]