User talk:Dragomirche

Welcome!

Hello, Dragomirche, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:TeslaTeamLogo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TeslaTeamLogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TeslaTeam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

hakeri upali na sajt univerziteta u Osijeku: TeslaTim postavio priču o stradanju srpske dece (VIDEO|url=http://www.smedia.rs/vesti/vest/108206/Hakovan-sajt-osijeckog-univerziteta-Srpski-hakeri-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Serbian

Template:Serbian has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mr. Granger (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:TeslaTeam1Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TeslaTeam1Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:10, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed tag

Please stop removing the {{citation needed}} tag that I've added to TeslaTeam. I was unable to find a reliable source that listed "Tesl4Hack3r" as the founder of TeslaTeam. If you can find one, feel free to add it. Until then, please leave the tag there. Mr. Granger (talk) 01:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

STOP! I don't know how I can say this any more clearly. If you object to these tags or think there is a reason they should be removed, please discuss it here or on the article talk page. Either that or provide reliable sources for these statements. Mr. Granger (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am journalist from Serbian newspapers and follow this group from the start, the hackers who made this group Tesl4Hack3r it's a ghost that's hiding well,i can't find him.the only thing i now it is that they have six team members and that's all.Can I get some email from you (Talk)

Wikipedia does not accept personal research, it only accepts published research in reliable sources. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:18, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you've published something in a reliable source saying that TeslaTeam has six members, though, feel free to list that source as a reference in the article. Mr. Granger (talk) 20:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are publish and one of the best hacker group from Balkan,they are always in newspapers,television and other media, Mr Granger you are absolutely right They are one of the most famous group in Serbia (Talk)

I know that they have twitter account and they have some email they don't have site or something like that i try to contact them (Talk)

Why did you block me?Please answer me... when i want to put staff for this team or to rewrite something else i can't.(Talk)

January 2014

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to TeslaTeam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to TeslaTeam, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read this

You have never once given an explanation of your edits in an edit summary or on a talk page. If you do not start communicating with other editors on Talk:TeslaTeam you are headed for a block from editing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to TeslaTeam. DVdm (talk) 15:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Admr Boltz 20:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i post members i don't know why did you do that (talk)

Because you repeatedly removed maintenance tags without fixing the issue. You really need to read WP:Verifiability and WP:RS and show you understand our policies. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dragomirche (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i want chat with you

Decline reason:

Sorry, I don't understand you. While it's OK not to be a native English speaker, you still need to have some basic skills in this language to be able to edit and communicate here. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dragomirche (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me because i am not a vandal Dragomirche (talk) 2:34 pm, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

On a purely technical level, that's probably true (in that you are not intentionally trying to damage Wikipedia). However, I am declining this appeal, since you are certainly due a block for disruptive editing, which has characterised all of your mainspace edits to date. Numerous other users have pointed out what you are doing wrong, referred you to the relevant polices and asked you to stop, but you have not heeded their advice. As such, whilst the logged reason for the block might not be entirely correct, the block itself certainly is. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dragomirche (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

you're wrong because I'm trying to fix some text where it says [citation needed] or something like,that i try to put corectly and true facts,and you gentlemen returned me back all the time. I had to contact Tesla Team,because some facts I didn't know

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And this shows (despite multiple attempts to advise you) you don't understand what is a reliable source for Wikipedia. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]