User talk:Drabdullayev17

Welcome!

Hello, Drabdullayev17, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2017 CAPS United F.C. season, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! J 947 07:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 CAPS United F.C. season

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2017 CAPS United F.C. season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. J 947 07:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, J947 (talk · contribs). I just create this article and I imrpove article within 3 days. What can I do for protect article from speedy deletion? --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 07:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted. J 947 07:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2017 CAPS United F.C. season) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2017 CAPS United F.C. season, Drabdullayev17!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hello, are you able to add your sources? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Drabdullayev17, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Drabdullayev17! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drabdullayev17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Gadfium. Why you think I did vandalism. Please explain. Drabdullayev17 (talk) 08:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This, this, this and any other edit in which you removed the name of the largest city and replaced with "capital" either indicate vandalism or a lack of competence. At best, these edits were pointless. They reduce rather than improve information. It is concerning that you do not understand this. I'm tempted to block you indefinitely or till you do understand. Your other edits have been productive, so you are only blocked for a short time. Please do not repeat the types of edits that lead to your block. Or you will receive a longer block.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Gadfium I just change infobox some country articles. but it is not vandalism because capital cities also largest cities.

<!--Name of country/territory's largest city. Use "capital" (without quotation marks) if it's the capital.-->

So why you block me? --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dlohcierekim. I did this edits because documentation page of {{Infobox country}} says if largest city is capital we can use like my edits. So I changed it. But I understand that it is not necessary. Can you unblock me now, please?

I have unblocked you, and I apologise for the block. I was not aware that the infobox suggested this.-gadfium 17:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gadfium --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Drabdullayev17. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Your addition to Draft:Murder_Among_Friends_(2016_TV_series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder Among Friends (2016 TV series) (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Galobtter was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need sources such as reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murder Among Friends (2016 TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Murder Among Friends (2016 TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drabdullayev17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drabdullayev17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2005–06 Gabala FC season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2005–06 Gabala FC season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005–06 Gabala FC season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 11:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mincivan, Zangilan, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 18:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AntonSamuel please explain why you revert my edit? Because there is a source for this edit. Azerbaijan Army liberate this town today. What is your reason? Drabdullayev17 (talk) 18:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please include sources for your edits - if Aliyev has stated that the town has been captured, this can be included in the article (emphasizing that it is he that has claimed this). If you can find a neutral and reliable source that reports it, you can write that "third-party sources have reported that the town has been captured by Azerbaijan" or use similar wording to express it. Removing the Armenian name is problematic with regard to WP:NPOV. AntonSamuel (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AntonSamuel the town is part of Azerbaijan. Before Armenian occupation population of the town is Azerbaijani. Why we have to use Armenian name of town? By the way other user revert all edits. Did you notice? How is still de-facto part of Artsakh?Drabdullayev17 (talk) 19:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've presented my argument with regard the Armenian names of the localities here: Talk:Zəngilan I'm keeping an eye on NK-related pages as they are currently the target of a lot of disruptive edits because of the conflict, both from pro-Azeri and pro-Armenian users. AntonSamuel (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AntonSamuel you wrote your thoughts. So I want write what I think. Before Armenian occupation this settlements never called in Armenian. And some of changed by Artsakh government. It is illegal government and their renaming is also illegal. And the town we mentioned is de-facto is part of Azerbaijan now. Why you still keep the status as de-facto Artsakh? Drabdullayev17 (talk) 19:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My arguments have focused on my opposition towards the removal of the Armenian names of the towns. On many articles anything connected to Armenia/Armenians, such as pictures of gravestones and churches has been removed as well - edits which I won't shy away from reverting. Regarding the infobox flags and the de facto/de jure status - if the conquest of the town can be confirmed by neutral sources, I'm a bit more ambivalent about that and so far I mostly haven't interfered in their removal/light infobox cleanups. AntonSamuel (talk) 19:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AntonSamuel your arguments is not reliable source. For NPOV All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Your arguments are editorial bias. If you want neutral source I think TASS is enough. Now I have to revert your edits. You didn't write any source for your arguments. Drabdullayev17 (talk) 20:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:ONUS to provide sufficently neutral and reliable sources is on editors wishing to include disputed content on Wikipedia pages. An admin protected the page for now because of the disruptive edits/edit warring, so any edits will have to wait. I do think it would be good if you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Core content policies a bit more. Remember to stay civil when dealing with your fellow editors and assume good faith. AntonSamuel (talk) 20:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mincivan, Zangilan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AntonSamuel if it is captured by Azerbaijan how this town is de facto part of Artsakh? Can you explain please? --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 10:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drabdullayev17 It was mainly your removal of the Armenian name as well as any mention of (potentially past) NKR/Artsakh control that I found problematic per our past discussion. Regarding the de facto status, this should be confirmed by third-party sources and not merely the statements of the Azeri government/Aliyev - however, I haven't interfered with that aspect of the edit to the infobox as I'm more ambivalent about it as I mentioned previously. AntonSamuel (talk) 10:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AntonSamuel what you mean third-party source? I think TASS is reliable and third-party source. Is it not enough for you? --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 10:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The TASS source re-reports Aliyev's claim, it does not confirm it - so the statement should reflect that. AntonSamuel (talk) 10:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]