User talk:DrJoe

Not whom you might think I am.

I note four messages accusing me of vandalism in various months, starting in SEPT.

Sorry, but that is not me. My ip must change each time.

DrJoeDrJoe 05:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beckjord

Are you the same person as User:Beckjord? android 79 01:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer this question. android 79 12:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DrJoe aka Beckjord: You are making a mockery of this article with this UFO's and interdimensional connection. There is zero proof of this kind of stuff and zero evidence...let's have it...where's the beef? I cleaned up your edit, rather than revert you, cause at this point, what difference does it make. You seriously need to read no original research and learn that you can't put opinion or personal beliefs in an encyclopedia...it simply doesn't wash.--MONGO 11:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

other researchers have a limited proof

tracks that end in snow on video, visual accounts of same elsewhere, disappearances, photo of a bigfoot materializing, photo of a bigfoot in a ufo.

By your standards, the entire article should not exist.

But it will not go away , nor will proponents. Mongo was a brute in a tv cowboy series, or was it Rawhide? E tu, Brute? (Shakespeare)

DrJoeDrJoe 11:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DrJoe...Mongo was a character in the movie Blazing Saddles...and I am REALLY HIM! A real live "brute"...Those Star Wars movies are based on fact...Bigfoot was in those movies and he was the Wookie! It's true!--MONGO 11:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mongo

Yes, and I think it was the blond co-star that tamed Mongo and brought him to her side. As for bigfoot/wookie, there is a photo of Bigfoot IN a ufo.

http://www.beckjord.com/bigfoot/bfufo.jpg

Glyceryl trinitrate (pharmacology)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Bartimaeus 11:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can't tell me not to edit

Nope. You edit, I edit.

DrJoeDrJoe 20:26, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of Wikipedia is not truth

I see you're very enthusiastic, but I think you're misunderstanding the purpose of Wikipedia. We're not here to publish "THE REAL TRUTH". It's simply not within the scope of the project. There's no way we could agree on what the real truth was, even if we wanted to. So, instead of truth, we use verifiability. We summarize what other reputable sources have already said. We would have to turn away Pulitzer-quality journalism or Nobel-quality science, if it were published here first. Sorry, but that's just how it is, and your own desire to publish your idea of the "real truth" here is not going to change that. Friday (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Mutilations

What is killing the animals and humans ? Linda Moulton Howe is investigating a really sickening animal mutilation. Martial Law 01:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Protected

The article "Bigfoot" is now designated as being `protected` until this(The Bigfoot matter.) is settled. Thought you might want to know. Martial Law 01:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]