User talk:DrGalen's Invictus

This is DrGalen's Invictus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:DrGalen's Invictus/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:DrGalen's Invictus/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DrGalen's Invictus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:DrGalen's Invictus/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:DrGalen's Invictus/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KylieTastic (talk) 11:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website - I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 13:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DrGalen's Invictus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Alex, We are not advertising, as this innovative service is free and does not charge individuals. It helps patients, carers and doctors in any medical emergencies and medical problems, and it will save people from dying, or coming to unnecessary harm. This tool, we believe will help to save people's lives and livelihoods. We consider providing this service to people as a great responsibility. Please help us disseminating via Wiki, which is a great platform. Thank You. Please contact us for further queries

Decline reason:

OK, my further query here will be, when will you guys start developing something that will improve your reading comprehension? Because it was explained in the notices above that you cannot use Wikipedia to promote your product, and I don't even have to quote from your deleted article to make the point that your language was unambiguously promotional—I will just let what you wrote above speak for itself. You just went right on doing what got you blocked ... in your first unblock request, yet.

I also don't know how you say that it wasn't advertising since you're going to be giving the product away and keep a straight face ... the point is not whether you intend to profit, it's that you're here promoting it.

Yes, Wikipedia is a great website, I would be the first to agree ... but it is decidedly not a platform. Indeed, that's why so many people come here, because it is probably the only place on the modern Internet where you know you're not going to get bombarded with ads literally getting pushed in your face without having to pay a fee. You will not blame us for doing our best to make sure our content is similarly not ads. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DrGalen's Invictus (talk) 03:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DrGalen's Invictus: We are not interested in what the representatives of a company/product/service want to say about it; you do not necessarily need to be selling something for your writing to be considered promotional. We care only about what reliable, third-party sources have chosen to publish about it, without financial inducement or expectation of other benefits. Significant coverage is required from these independent sources to pass Wikipedia's notability criteria, as a company/person/thing is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. Please realize that Wikipedia readers expect articles to be factual, verifiable by reliable third-party sources, and written from a neutral point of view independently of their subjects.

Administrators rarely, if ever, unblock users unless they express interest in editing other topic areas unrelated to their conflict of interest. You would benefit from reviewing the links before deciding what to do next:

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]