Jump to content

User talk:DrFrench/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello DrFrench! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini 00:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Falkland Islands Article in Arbitration

Having briefly reviewed the article's discussion history, I've identified you as a potentially aggrieved editor whose contributions may have been negatively impacted by the actions of a group of editors who are alleged to be POV-pushing and engaging in WP:GAMES. I invite you to peruse the arbcom request and voice your opinion and experiences, at your leisure. The link is:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#WP:NPOV_and_WP:GAMES_in_.22Falkland_Islands.22_and_related_articles

Thank you.Alex79818 (talk) 22:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

British Rail Class 142

You said the manufacturer stated that there are 106 or 121 seats on a 142. Yet Northern Spirit, Merseytravel and Arriva Trains Wales have all refurbished units so they are many different seating patterns. If you have any up-to-date references saying there are only 106 or 121 seat combinations, then please add them to the article. Otherwise leave well alone. 217.37.120.25 (talk) 08:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

T&W sta infobox

I have made an alteration to this so now it is possible to add platforms. However, i feel i have made it compulsory and so it may need to be added to all stations. I have left a similar message on the WP:T&W talk page Simply south 01:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I have changed the title so that it may be possible in future to add things under the operations, not just the platforms. (I also sometimes need to think more first!) I think i only changed Monument so i'll check. Simply south 11:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Tyne and Wear

Hi there I'm the Manager of WikiProject Tyne and Wear, I noticed you have left comments on the talk page of the Project Tyne and made some improvements, because of your contributions and your apparent interest in the project I would like to invite you to become a member and to generally help improve the articles, I hope your interested and I'll look forward to seeing your username on the Participants section hopefully in the near future! if you have any comments please contact me or leave a note on the talk page of the project.TellyaddictEditor review! 12:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Shiremoor/Backworth

Thanks for explanation on my talk page. I'll leave it alone, as I didn't find precise verification in the first place. BTW you forgot to sign. --Richhoncho 21:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The Artists' Studio

I'm not entirely sure I understand the reason behind your tagging well enough to be able to fix it. The AfD for this article initially forced an overabundance of sources from a variety of places which is why there are so many print sources available, though considering theatres strive for reviews, post auditions, and experience controversy, I find it difficult to understand exactly what this tag is going for. Perhaps you could enlighten me as more details in your reasoning, and advice as to what needs to be done. Of course, any help would be appreciated as well! Thanks. --Enhanceddownloadbird 18:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Ally Pally

Got your note on my talk about the panoramic image. That's fine. Just a question... You said: 'I notice you've undone my reversion already before I could finish this note. I will undo that, not out of spite, but purely because I didn't get the chance to tell you why before.'

I don't understand... I did no reversion of the page - I only made one edit which was soley to make it a wide image. J.P.Lon 00:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Caledonian Sleeper and Highland Chieftain

STOP CHANGING MY EDITS PLEASE

why u keep changing my edits?

why is it if U dont agree with something that it shud b deleted? without sme1 els baking u up


u should gt consensous to remove — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.234.187 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 4 March 2007

Hi, DrFrench, could I remind you of the three-revert rule, which in a nutshell is that "Edit warring is harmful. Editors who revert a page in whole or in part more than three times in 24 hours, except in certain special circumstances, are likely to be blocked from editing". Whilst I agree that the timetable information isn't appropriate, it doesn't come under any of the exemptions from 3RR. If 81.109.234.187 puts the information back in after you have removed it, you should discuss this on the talk page. If you ignore the 3RR you could be blocked despite your edits being well intentioned. Adambro 13:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

it would help if drfrench would rply on his talk page to my questins

I have replied to your questions. I have replied by adding comments to your talk page. Please read them.

DrFrench 13:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

u shud kep questions and answrs n th same pag how can u follow a conversation othrwise? so pleas reply here

I find it hard to follow your conversations as you insist on using text speak. Please consider using normal English. Please remember to sign your comments. I left the comments on your user page so you would be alerted that was a new message for you. And you were obviously aware that I had left a coment there, becasue you blanked the page.

DrFrench 13:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


You just wanna get rid of something you dont like and has had some work put into it - i think it very selfish and you havent asked if anyone eles dosnt want them in

Timetables.

This is a cross-post. Due to your Edit waring over Highland Chieftain and Caldeonian Sleeper, you've violated 3RR, therefore I've reverted to a pre-edit-war version and reported you both on the 3RR noticeboard. Please refrain from editing the articles until the matter has been settled. Thanks, Will (Speak to Me/Breathe)(Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash) 13:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

, for 24 hrs Rlevse 15:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

WMSR

Great work with the Wrexham, Shropshire and Marylebone Railway article: it needed something like that. I've made a couple of subtle modifications to your version: hope you don't mind! --RFBailey 23:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

This is everyone's Wikipedia

WP:KETTLE. Have a nice day. Chris cheese whine 21:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I wasn't aware that editing in line with our policies and guidelines was contrary to consensus, of which you are clearly the ultimate arbiter. Chris cheese whine 21:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
What it doesn't say is that you need to obtain a consensus of immediately-involved parties every time you want to make a small change, when there are perfectly good policies and consensus behaviour already. Drop in to WP:IFD some time and see various cosmetic imagery get deleted on a regular basis. I even brought this up at the Pump, and the response seems to be in no doubt about it. It seems you are clearly misunderstanding what consensus actually means. Chris cheese whine 21:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Station nameboards at WP:IFD

I have followed the recommendation made to be at the Pump, and proposed these for deletion at WP:IFD. Feel free to weigh in on the discussion there (remember that thing you said about "building consensus"?). Chris cheese whine 22:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Top Gear Dog

Can you please refrain from constantly undoing other people's edits without first discussing them on the talk page? I see you have already been temporarily banned in the past for such actions.

Well you may have noticed that I have backed down and created a new Top Gear Dog page, the aim being for this to make "featured article" status at some point. The presenter part of the main Top Gear page that has become so argued about has been removed.

If you disagree, I recommend to make your opinions clear on the Talk:Top_Gear_Dog page. Davesmith33 19:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Davesmith33

I am working on a WP:AN/I report right now for disruption. His edits right now are ridiculous. I think a RfC would be a great idea. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 22:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The Stig

The stig is not a presenter, he is a co-star. Davesmith33 12:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Consensus of opinion seems to disagree with you. DrFrench 13:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Tyne and Wear metro nameboards

Please stop edit-warring over the issue of nameboards for the Tyne and Wear Metro station articles (e.g. Haymarket Metro station). Some kind of compromise needs to be reached, and persistent tit-for-tat reversions will not achieve this. I have left this message for all the editors involved.

As a compromise, I suggest having the nameboards somewhere else in the article but not as the station name in the infobox. Personally, I think this is the fairest solution. Please give it consideration. --RFBailey 19:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Arbcom

You have been included as a 'related party' in a request for arbitration Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Bullying_and_Victimisation_against_Davesmith33 Davesmith33 17:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

This explains a lot, will keep a good eye on this issue from now on. Regards, SqueakBox 21:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for sorting out the links for the Virgin Trains logos on Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_April_9#Image:Virgin_trains_logo_red.gif. I couldn't work out what I was doing wrong - it's obvious now! DrFrench 02:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Just did it for the first time myself tonight, I had the same problem earlier! Glad I could help :) - Cloudz679 02:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Duplicates

Can you substitute on your subpages all svg-images for railwaydiagrams, which are duplicates, with the other one ? That will be nice. You can find them here. The filenames start with "BSicon" and contain the substring "STB" somewhere behind. Thank you. 84.150.215.245 11:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Falkland Islands

Whoops... thanks for letting me know about the version mix-up. It's been really hard to keep track over the past while. I've made the change (and I notice that the page is now protected as well.) Cheers! --Ckatzchatspy 22:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Sabine Schmitz

Can you stop vandalising the Top Gear pages. The removal of Sabine Schmitz is both childish and is violating the neutrality of the project. Davesmith33 16:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Disagreeing with Davesmith33 != WP:VAND. DrFrench 21:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

TG

Rather peaceful round here now, isn't it? ;) --Steve (Stephen) talk 23:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding the word featured to the sentence It is not necessary and I creating unnecessary ambiguity and is upsetting the tone and flow of the introduction the article. Many thanks--Lucy-marie 19:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Station nameboards

Closed off as requested; however, the Mock London Underground station plates have not been added back to any articles, which makes them orphans and ripe for deletion. I hope someone who is interested in the name plates adds them to articles (hint, hint). -Regards, Nv8200p talk 16:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Northern City Line

You can revert whatsoever you wish, as long as you have the interests of the article at heart. I was puzzled by your decision to remove the London Underground at Highbury & Islington though. I would have thought this merited inclusion. Ho hum ... I do not know what the rules are for what to inlcude/exclude on the maps ... perhaps you can point me to your source of information on this. Miner2049er 09:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I certainly do have the interest if this (and other articles) at heart. I guess there are no 'rules', but I try to keep things simple but informative. I have created a number of maps for a variety of articles, but each one is different. It can be difficult to decide what to include or exclude, but I guess it's best to think 'does including it add anything to the diagram' or 'will excluding it detract from the diagram'. Adding in lines that don't connect with the route being mapped isn't generally going to add anything and often make it harder to understand. Each station is linked, so the reader can click the Highbury wikilink for more information. If you add the Victoria line and Thameslink, then someone will add the Northern line, and the North London line and the Circle line... and in the end you won't be able to see the Northern City line! DrFrench 21:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Whatever ... Miner2049er 21:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear sir, the message that you left on my talk page was rather aggressive and impolite. I am new to this place, so may I kindly remind you of of WP:BITE and WP:KETTLE. This place is all about cooperation and collaboration, so please do not take any edits of the Northern City Line to represent an incursion into your territory. Miner2049er 21:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
??? Yes you are new - but what was the reason for the "Whatever" comment you posted above? thatwas uncalled for. I was polite to you when I posted on your talk page originally and I was polite to you when answering your question above. I didn't think your "whatever" comment was either polite or justified. Asking you to be civil is not aggressive or biting the newbies and seeing as I wasn't rude to you, I'm not quite sure what your point is. DrFrench 21:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
:::: Sir, you did not fully answer my question of the source of your information of what to include/exclude on the maps. Your explanation seems to infer that there are 'no rules', and that it is up to individual editors to decide what is best. To my mind this invites 'edit wars' and does nothing to ensure an element of consistency between maps. I would remind you that 'anarchy' is not an option ... we need clear rules/guidelines ... and so I further request that you point me in the direction of them. BTW, I find your offhand attitude not to my liking, and is not WP:CIVIL. Please adjust your behavior with immediate effect :-) Miner2049er 21:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
In Wikipedia it's normal to try and work things out through WP:CONSENSUS rather than having rigid rules - see WP:FIVE. I'm sorry if you find my attitude 'offhand' but if you go round saying 'whatever' to people in the real world, I'm sure you'll find people will react negatively. If you ask people nicely instead, you'll get a much better reaction. If my attitude is not to your liking - well tough. I was polite to you, I tried to be helpful and you were just rude in return. If you'd like to apologise and strike out your comment above, then we can start over. To answer your other question, try looking at WP:TRAIL and its associated talk page if you want to discuss the railway line templates and their implementation. DrFrench 22:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
It is clearly "your" page ... so I shall cease making any further edits to it. Miner2049er 18:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Whatever. To be honest I have no idea what you are going on about. I haven't made an edit to the Northern City Line page for over a week, whereas you have made four edits to it in that time. That's hardly page ownership. Anyway, it seems you've thrown your toys out of your pram just because a couple of people have made polite and helpful suggestions to you. Oh well.... DrFrench 20:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Cruise (clothing)

Thanks for noticing me about this article's speedy deletion nomination, maybe I should inform you though that all I did was creating a redirect on this article as I'm part of the Fashion WikiProject and we were simply enforcing the naming convention of disambiguated clothes brands' articles. I modified a good number of them and didn't really check the articles actually, not seeing this particular one was nothing more than advertising. Thanks for clearing the article, but I'm really not the creator of it, the notice wasn't really necessary. Thanks for your time. Thiste 01:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Civility, or otherwise

Hi DrFrench, with regard to your discussion above with User:Miner2049er your comment about "throwing toys out of the pram", while perhaps not unprovoked, was not appropriate. Please try and avoid doing such things: in this case you've contibuted to scaring away an editor who was making useful contributions (see this). --RFBailey 21:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair doos, but do bear in mind my 'throwing the toys out of a pram comment' was made after he posted his 'quit' notice - and was my comment on the quit notice, not a cause of it. I am at a loss to understand why he has acted as he did. For example, I posted an explanation on his talk page (see here) as to why I reverted one of his changes. I did that as I was trying to be friendly and willing to discuss the matter, as I did on my talk page here. Instead I received rather aggressive and sarcastic responses. Yes, my comment is perhaps regrettable (being said in the heat of the moment) - but was a result of (and not the cause of) his decision to quit. As far as I can see, no-one has been nasty to him - only constructive and helpful suggestions were made. (I've struck out the comment above, which I understand is the correct etiquette? As in not trying to hide the fact I said it by deleting it, but withdrawing the comment). DrFrench 22:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
OK, but my feeling (even yesterday, before he quit) was that the whole discussion above didn't help. That said, he does seem to have been rather paranoid and defensive. Don't worry about it. --RFBailey 22:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Question

Hi there - just a quick question re: User:Davesmith33. For some reason he is on my watch list, and since he's been unblocked I can't say enough about how terrible I find his behaviour. I was curious at to whether there is any other action that could be taken against him (I am relatively new here) - i.e. permanent block or longer bans?

On a similar note, see any similarity between this and this? Dates don't overlap and the pages that the edits are made to are all top gear related (and even non-TG ones like this one have a definite TG slant on them). Just a thought.

You seem to be quite heavily involved in the Davesmith issue, but if you would care for any assistance is solving the problem, I would be more than happy to help. ...adam... (131.111.244.234 08:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC))

Guess it doesn't matter anymore - it's a real shame about the guy. ...adam... (131.111.8.104 12:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC))
Sorry - yes, by the time I got round to replying to you, he'd already 'erupted'. I guess I was 'heavily involved', albeit reluctantly - and it's always a bit nasty if someone gets blocked.
By the way, re your comments above, do you think that Davesmith33 and Suave12 are the same person?
Just for reference, there are things that can be done when people are acting like that; WP:AN if you need to bring something to an Admin's attention, WP:RFC if you want to get some 'community opinion' (and there are other dispute reolution options highlighted on that page). By the way, you might want to consider registering and getting your own username. You seem to be interested in building a better Wikipedia, registering makes it easier for other people to recognise you and you build your 'authority'. Happy editing! DrFrench 13:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
D'Oh, I just realised that you are registered and do have a user name... ooops! DrFrench 13:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

User page

Thanks for the barnstar! And no problem at all. My userpage got hit first so I was watching all the user's edits and didn't think what they did to your userpage was appropriate!! See above a suggestion that Davesmith33 and Suave1 are the same user? Well both blocked now anyway! Mark83 19:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Clarkson

No, that comment wasn't aimed at you. Nandesuka 23:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair doos - I was a bit confuddled!  :-) DrFrench 23:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Nice work...

...on the Newcastle & North Shields Railway article. The map really improves things. Do you have any pictures handy (of the Metro line, say) that might illustrate it? I'm still trying to find an illustration of the old Carliol Square station. Regards, ProhibitOnions (T) 19:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


I'd like to know what was so speculative about my input, other than perhaps the last section, which I'd have been glad to remove myself. All the rest is accurate according to the official metro leaflets. user:Rockvamp 22:28, 05 May 2007 (GMT)

Kingston Park

Thank you for catching and correcting the edit to quoted text at Kingston Park. Editore99 13:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem, I have reverted the decade wikilinks too. I thought them useful in putting the development into the context of its time - although you may still feel they are superfluous, if so feel free to remove. DrFrench 14:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Turnpike Lane

Hi there. My reasoning for adding the link to the borough page is: that education is considered a part of describing settlements (How to), and that education in London is organised by the boroughs, so it makes sense to list them under the boroughs. There has been a rash of editors recreating lists against each settlement, and adding this link is to forestall such duplication.

Your mileage may differ, and that's fine too. Perhaps you could expand on your reasoning - in which case, I might even change my mind. Cheers. Kbthompson 14:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

My reason for removing it is that it seemed overkill to do that for one topic. The infobox lists the borough and links to the borough's article - and the borough is the LEA. (In other parts of the country the County Council is the LEA, but either way each infobox will already show a clear link to the LEA). If you start adding that text for education, then you'll end up withother people doing similar links for health services, police. The article will simply be full of clutter that infoboxes were designed to help remove. (It's also relevant that TL is a street rather than a settlement...) DrFrench 14:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I appreciate the reasoning. I've only done it for some boroughs, normally where I see editors adding single schools - or entire groups. For some reason, Haringey was next on the radar. There certainly should be an education list in the borough page, I hope you'll agree. The main problem seems to occur when (say) Hackney Central (name changed to actually prevent the occurrence) is confused with the boro' and somebody knocks in a list that lacks geographic focus. In London, the LEA is not necessarily the borough, but it will certainly follow boro' boundaries.
I shall now think about the matter further. Funny, I always regard Turnpike Lane as a district, not just a tube station, or a street ... All the best Kbthompson 14:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Michael McDowell

Hi I notice you edited out my contribution to the infobox on the MMcD page. I contend that Mr. Mc Dowell ceased to be a TD along with 165 of the 166 members of Dail Eireann when the Dail was disolved on 29th April. Only one TD continued in office between this time and the election on 24th May, the Ceann Comhairle or Speaker who is elected automatically. The 15 members of the government (cabinet) continue in office until the election of their successors most likely on the first day of the new Dail 14th June. Therefore it is my contention that Mr. McDowell ceased to be a TD on 29th April and continues to be a Minister until some date in teh future most probably 14th June. I know this may sound petty but it is technically the way the system of government is continued in Ireland during an election. I hope you understand my position. Rigger30 14:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi thanks for your comment. I appreciate your general agreement with my point. I was viewing it from the point of informing those who might consult wikipedia as an educatinal tool. However I also accept that it is necessary to have consistency on such issues. It is debatable which should win out consistency or technical correctness. I myself would tend to err towards correctness where possible however I accept that this could be difficult to achieve accross a large number of articles. Rigger30 17:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, regarding the timing of Mr McDowell's resignation from public life speech, it was actually before the official announcement that he had lost his seat. I think this is a relevant point. Furthermore, the version of events to which you have reverted is factually incorrect. User:Geraldkelly 23:49, 5 June 2007 (BST)

poor editing

Sorry for the poor editing on the disused tunnel page, also note I've had time to read the wiki rules and you were correct about entering you own site. No hard feelings I hope. regards Rob

Your recent edit to Andrew Montgomery (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Station stubs & categories

Hi, you probably want to read this discussion. Thanks, --RFBailey 14:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

meetup

Being a wikipedian in Tyne and Wear, being near Sunderland. You may be intrested in Wikipedia:meetup/Sunderland. Help arrange some plans!. 217.43.213.72 21:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Clarkson "facebook trivia"

Hi. I don't want to revert because I don't feel strongly enough about. I would just like to say I have seen several such references on the internet and the "drive" to make him to PM (however jokingly) made it to my local radio station (in Belfast). No matter how you guage that I would classify it as notable. What do you think? Mark83 21:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

A one-off semi-'humourous' story that makes it to the newswires doesn't count as notability in my book. Who will remember it in a few week's time? In an article about the 'Facebook phenomenum', maybe it deserves a mention - but 1100 characters in this article? DrFrench 22:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Sale of Goods Act

I guess I am looking for advice on what to do with the page Sale of Goods Act. Basically the page name is ambigious, and currently refers only to the UK (or is it GB) sale of good act. An act of exactly the same name is also used in NZ.

Ideas?

Some other problem Acts:

NevilleDNZ 04:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikilinking of dates in Michael McDowell

Hi, would you please stop linking the months and years in Michael McDowell's article, it's a common mistake. Do not use WP:Consenus to justify your POV. In fact you are in breach of the 3RR rule. regards, Snappy56 08:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, although winning the coveted 'Lamest edit war ever' prize would be great, I'd rather not!
Secondly, as I'm rapidly losing interest in this, you can go ahead and link in irrelevant years + months, I don't care anymore.
Thirdly, the consensus is actually the way it is done at the moment. I edit a lot if biographical atricle (Irish politics) and only full dates are linked, years only or years + months are not. Check out Bertie Ahern to see what I mean. Changing this common approach for one article is a breach of the established consensus. This consensus has been established by many different editors or several years. As recent comer to Wikipedia (January 2007 it appears), you are coming in and dogmatically imposing your POV, this is not a good approach, Regards Snappy56 10:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Snappy56 I would remined you of WP:BITE, and WP:CIVIL. Your approach is also not good. Canterberry 11:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Éire

Another Éire related issue. In this diff the bot corrected the spelling of a press release title. However that was how it is spelt in the press release, I think the citation should accurately reflect the spelling in the press release. DrFrench 12:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. You're probably right, so I've made a note of it so my bot won't try to correct it again. Cheers, CmdrObot 14:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:BSicon uxABZlf.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:BSicon uxABZlf.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Manchester Metrolink logo small.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Tynemouth Metro station

Doctor,

Yes it is obvious to you and me but not everyone in the world knows where Tynemouth is. This is why i put what town, what county and what country the station is.

Ta.

--Whohe! (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Newcastle Central

I'd have to disgagree. It doesn't impose too much on the paragraph and such an important piece if information should come in that place. Such is the case with other stations such as Derby Midland and Newport. WL (talk) 15:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Essex Road

Sorry, I assumed the T+W stations were subsurface, I stand corrected. But are the trains actually the same loading gauge as NR trains? I thought they were narrower.

So that makes:

Twin large tube tunnels only:

  • Haymarket
  • Monument
  • Essex Road

Twin large tubes plus small tube train services:

  • Heathrow Central (I guess technically the same as Terminals 1,2,3, as they are interconnected by subways)
  • Heathrow Terminal 4 (T5 platforms are subsurface)
  • Old Street

Single large tube plus surface/subsurface platforms:

  • Lime Street
  • Moorfields
  • Liverpool Central

Are there any others that I missed out? I assume there aren't any in West Midlands/Manchester/Sheffield/Nottingham etc. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 11:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your response! Much appreciated! Would you know anything more about the Merseyrail stations? I'm just going by the text and pics here on Wiki. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 00:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Emre

The move is official and all the details have already been confirmed by FIFA, so a 'crystal ball' was hardly needed - there was a very valuable reference right here [1] . Thanks, Sparrowgoose, 17:16, 3 June 2008 (HKT)

Sunday Times Golden Globe Race

Hi, thanks for your hard work fixing the units in Sunday Times Golden Globe Race. Much appreciated! — Johan the Ghost seance 15:21, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Irish postcode CIO

I noticed your reverts on Republic of Ireland postal addresses and your note on Garydubh's talk page. Indeed we had a run in with him some months ago where he was previously pushing his "postcode" system on the Republic of Ireland postal addresses page trying to justify, firstly his system as being a post code system, even though An Post have not decided on any such nationwide system and the Irish government deferred plans for any offical postcode system, and secondly that his system is a true post code system when it is in fact a gps based building locator that may or may not be used by any non-postal authority as a delivery assistant. His coi is admitted but he insists on calling his system a post code system. Besides, the new url www.irishpostcodes.ie he now gives , is a beta, so is still not a commercial product. Have a look at the Republic of Ireland postal addresses history as well as the deleted postd from his own talk page especially this, this and the history of this anon IP user which Gary admits was his work too. Cheers (I reply where I post; so I'm watching here for a while) ww2censor (talk) 15:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Initially I was simply going to revert what looked like WP:LINKSPAM, but when I glanced at his contribution log it looked like a clear case of WP:COI to me - with some aggressive POV-pushing. I added the COI warning to ensure that there's no doubt he's been given fair warning. I'm also concerned by some of his posts on Talk:Republic of Ireland postal addresses, specifically this and this which are not discussion points, merely linkspam. Do you know if this issue has ever been raised at the COI noticeboard? I'm going to raise the 'talk page spam' issue there to see what the consensus is about removing posts from a talk page. DrFrench (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
This issue has not been brough to the COI noticeboard but I see you have done so already. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 03:59, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

DRFrench - why have you removed my input here - are you and Mr Censor the only ones allowed to contribute??? GaryDubh--86.41.143.79 (talk) 18:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

DrFrench - please return my comprehensive response here or state where it has been moved to and your justification (Hyperlinks Allowed)--Garydubh (talk) 18:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I reverted your post as it wasn't 'input', it was merely a rant that has no place on my talk page. DrFrench (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I am sure in your rules you will note that I have the right of reply - --Garydubh (talk) 18:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Wrexham and Shropshire Route Diagram

In regard to the W&S route map, I called it a 'line' as I thought it most appropriate. What do you suggest I call it? I know it isn't a proper 'line' but it is an interesting route and I think it deserves a route diagram. What do you think?Mpvide65 (talk) 23:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate your comments but different articles such as the Wolverhampton to Shrewsbury Line only concentrate on their one area. The W&S diagram at least puts all the info from individual lines onto one route diagram, which I think is useful.Mpvide65 (talk) 23:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I kind of get your drift. How about I create a link from the W&S Page to the route diagram template page, so that people can view it if they're interested. I'll then restore the old map.Mpvide65 (talk) 23:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I suppose now people who want to look at it only have to click a link. I only hope people do not delete it. I can't think of anything to add to its page to make it more notable.Mpvide65 (talk) 23:51, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I've just added a two links, one in route and one in see also. Thanks for all your time.Mpvide65 (talk) 23:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Blyth Power Station

It's a shame about that video. Do you know if there any way around the copyright? Or if it would be suitable to provide a link to an alternate video I have found, which doesn't appear to have a copyright? Blyth Power Station - the end! Fintan264 (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the heads-up! It's amazing the irrational conclusions people will jump to sometimes. hehe Dp76764 (talk) 20:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

For removing the redirect. Didn't mean to. Thanks for correcting it! :D LicenseFee (talk) 07:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

London King's Cross railway station CTRL naming

FWIW, I totally agree about the naming of the CTRL (legally and formally, it still it). There was a long-term wrangling on CTRL and the wording eventually worked out was "High Speed 1 (HS1), known as the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) during construction". I changed the footnote on the KX article to match, to avoid anyone else altering it further and in a less controlled way. The wording would have matched CTRL article opening line and been "undisputable"! —Sladen (talk) 10:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Emma368 at it again

Emma368 has found some fuel for the Top Gear dispute. He/she's criticized us for not being neutral and has even tagged the article to be nominated for it's neutrality. Just thought I'd let you know. Looneyman (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I just came over here to add a comment to that effect. This has to stop. I'm not at all familiar with controversy management beyond the very basics (i.e. 3RR, etc.), but what can be done to stop this person? If his/her name is a sockpuppet, perhaps it should be reported. I read back over his/her history and that of Davesmith, and it seems abundantly obvious they are one and the same person. --Drmargi (talk) 17:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
I have just reported Emma368 as a possible sockpuppet. Now we wait and see where it goes. You can put your views on the case here. Looneyman (talk) 18:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:Fenerbahçe SK squad

In Turkey Colin Kazim-Richards is known as Kazim Kazim and therefore he should be listed as such on the template. Skitzo (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

If you check the Turkish national team article he is listed as Kâzım Kâzım on that also, seeing how he represents Turkey and is therefore considered Turkish he should be listed in the Turkish manner, until such time as he leaves the club. Skitzo (talk) 21:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Its not that big a deal to me and I'm happy to accept your view point, I just thought since he was a Turkish national and currently playing there then we should use their version. but like I said I'm not really all that concerned so I'll leave it as is. Skitzo (talk) 22:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
not a problem. Skitzo (talk) 22:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Harry Kewell

we need to watch this article atm because people keep adding all the Galatasaray S.K. templates and categories despite there being no official confirmation he has actually joined the club (his agent has denied the clubs claims). Skitzo (talk) 22:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Copypaste of my comment at User talk:DoctorFrench

Reposted here in case you'd miss it, or in the not unlikely event of its conspicuous deletion by the person in question:

  • I just noticed your query at the admin's talk page. I've seconded it on grounds of impersonation, with a link to my compiled (and rather clinching, I think) evidence. Thanks for being willing to help stamp out this little fire! - Vianello (talk) 20:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Update: User:Islander has extended the block to indefinite over this specific matter. Hooray! - Vianello (talk) 20:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Emre

You are right, my mistake. I've done some research and Emre hasn't signed yet at Fenerbahce. So i agree with you. Lucha-Method (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

phil taylor

lets talk about phil taylor, help me out with this so what I want to say can be added, because it should be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 21:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

If you look at Pele's page and Roger Federer's page on this site both say that they are regarded as the best ever in their sport in the first paragraph at the time. There really is no reason why we can't have the same on Phil Taylor's page, anyone with any sense knows that Phil is the greatest player ever and it should be there stating that he is thought my most to be the best ever. Please explain to me why it's on Pele's page and Roger Federer's page and not Phil Taylor's ?????

Why can't anyone answer me on the above question??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 21:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Probably because you say things like "anyone with any sense knows Phil is the greatest". This is an encyclopaedia not a fan site. Anyway, I've no idea why you're dragging me into it again after five months. DrFrench (talk) 19:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

The point is that if there is anyone current alive sportsperson that deserves the best ever tag then it's Phil Taylor, even you can't argue with that. And yet you won't let me put it into his profile when it's on the profiles of other sportspersons.

Why not? Just answer me why not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 19:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not after a fanboy type statement just a simple "is regarded as the greatest player of all time by many." or such like. whats so wrong with that? (Davo) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

If you really can't understand why that has no place in an encyclopaedia, then you really don't understand what Wikipeia is about. Read WP:VERIFY and (specifically) WP:WEASEL for starters. Oh and if you must post here, please remember to sign your posts using ~~~~. DrFrench (talk) 20:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

So why is it on other peoples profiles and not allowed on Taylor's??? That is all I ask? (DAVO ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 20:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Did you actually read anything I wrote above? DrFrench (talk) 21:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes I did, But it doesn't answer my question. It's on others so why can't it be put on properly with links on Taylors. Can't you answer that? Or do you just have something against Phil Taylor? I don't get it. Whats the reason why it's allowed on other but not Taylor's? (DAVO) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 21:04, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

1. WP:WEASEL gives you all the information you need to answer your own question. Go on, have another read of it and see if you can work it out. 2. I have nothing against Phil Taylor. In fact I really don't give a flying f**k about him either way - but I do care about the integrity of Wikipedia. 3. Why can't you manage to sign your posts using ~~~~ it's really not that hard and there's a reminder at the top of the page everytime you add a comment. DrFrench (talk) 21:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps you should go and check those other profiles and edit them and tell them that no one is allowed to say that someone is regarded as the best in their field, because thats what people are doing on others profiles. (DAVO) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 21:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

"integrity of Wikipedia" - double standards more like. Whats allowed and not checked or sorted on other profiles is nipped in the bud straight away on others. When both are saying the same thing. For ages it said on here that Clint Eastwood was a vegan with tons of links and everything backed up, yet an interview with him the other day revealed that he wasn't and not only that, he didn't actually know what a vegan was!! And yet stuff like this about someone like Phil Taylor is no allowed. Makes this site look silly if you ask me.

And you still can't answer the question! (DAVO) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 21:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not your slave. Why should I answer your question when you can't bothered learn and can't even be bothered sign your posts? But seeing as you're a bit hard of understandng, let's see if you can spot the difference...
1. Some tennis critics, legendary players, and current players consider Federer to be among the greatest players in the modern era history of this sport. Here are some verifiable references to those authoritative sources so you can check them yourself and make up your own mind.
2. Davo says that Taylor is the bestest darts player in the world ever. Anyone who disagrees is stupid. And smells of wee.
Now I'll give you a little clue... one of those is good and allowed on Wikipedia and one of those is bad and not allowed on Wikipedia. Can you tell which is which? I'll give you another clue, at the top of the WP:WEASEL page that you didn't bother to read it says, "Avoid using phrases such as "some people say" without providing sources." DrFrench (talk) 21:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

My point has always been to do it the proper way, use links and so forth for Taylor. Not just me saying it. But you don't seem interested in that, and that was all I was trying to do in the first place but I was shot down. Just because I am not an expert at using this site. I think the same thing thats on Fededer's page can be put on Taylor's page. What is wrong with that? I tried to get the ball rolling but was shot down. I wanted to provide sources and make it proper with links and sources and whatever it needs. I don't know how to do it properly, I find this site hard to us, forgive me for being stupid and not being able to understand how to use it but I struggle to understand this site.

I think my point is pretty valid. As I said maybe you or someone in the know could put it up on Taylor's page. What is wrong with that?

I'm not here for an argument or to be insulted. (DAVO) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.55.96 (talk) 22:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

What is wrong with it is the way you have gone about it. If you go and find the sources, then you can ask for help in adding them to the page - someone will help you out if you ask nicely. But you can't expect anyone else to go and find the sources for you! So far you've acted like a stroppy toddler ("It's not fair, Federer's article says it why can't Taylor's?") that's not going to persuade anyone to go out of their way to help you. And you still can't manage to type ~~~~ at the end of your comments... how hard is that???? DrFrench (talk) 22:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Feet and inches on Virgin train article

I agree! But I only changed it to get rid of the horrible numbers that were in the infobox 5 x 106 etc.

To complete the picture (no pun intended), the image of the Super Voyager was a copy vio and was deleted! I just though the new livery needed to be represented on the page. Will look out for another image.

Regards, Btline

Top Gear Issue

Are you willing to reach a negotiated settlement re: the Top Gear issues, or do we carry on with the fun and games? Please see the Top Gear discussion page for more details. SabineSchmitz (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

BTP jurisdiction

"Jurisdiction" is the heading/expression used in statute where a constable's area of operation is defined.--MBRZ48 (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

not vandalism

Your characterization of the restoration of inclusion of images which are disputed, such as in this edit, as vandalism is incorrect. Please assume good faith on the part of your fellow editors. --Stlemur (talk) 21:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Stop removing images

Stop removing images before such images have been debated. You are not even flagging the pages, which is wrong. ♦Drachenfyre♦·Talk 21:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

If you are removing these images truely in good faith, and in accordance with wiki policy, for some reason that they do not meet wiki standards, then I sincerly apologize for my rash rush to judgement. I am not offering this as an excuse, but the pages for Plaid have been vandalized and vandalized often, with much misinterpertation. Because you did not post any warning boxes, which seems standard, it raised alarm bells at a questionable motive.♦Drachenfyre♦·Talk 15:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

re. Public Opinion

Hey Doc,

Would you mind heading over to my talk page when you get a chance.

Thanks.

(http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:124.189.99.166)


Typo redirect 0 191 ·

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 0 191 ·, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 0 191 · is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 0 191 ·, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:50, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

list of freesat channels

the link links to the page you made it go to, i am merely changing the display name as bbc alba is the offical name of the chanenl if oyu have a problem take it up british tv portal--Andrewcrawford (talk) 21:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

No i redirect bbc alba to the galiec digial service but both bbc alba and gailic digital service are wrong it should be BBC Alba (Tv Channel) this is what all the other pages use like sky an virgin. i said test the link so you would look and see it redirected to gailic digital service and not bbc alba but ti said bbc alba--Andrewcrawford (talk) 08:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Freesat

Oh please do explain how it is a link spam??? it provides the only information abotu the pvr currently so why remove it it? it not like the site trying to advertise it.--Andrewcrawford (talk) 19:24, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

BBC Alba

Hello, I wasn't aware of the "fair use" thing and i've sorted it out. I was just wondering if it was ok to be used. Image:BBC_Alba.jpg (MacSteaphain (talk) 17:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC))

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 21:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

British Rail Class 442

Could you please explain your reasons for removing the updated notes section. You mentioned 'uncited & unencyclopaedic detail'. Could you expand on that please.

Ashley.f5 (talk) 10:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I've taken your comments onboard and therefore seeing that some of the content was gossip like. However, I have added the date when the trains were taken off lease as I see this as being important.

Ashley.f5 (talk) 21:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Weisz

Hi, there really is no doubt that she was born in 1970- the bfi and companies house are far more reliable sources than the word of some journalist. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel (talk) 19:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I don't believe that you are correct that we have to cite conflicting sources when two are clearly more reliable otherwise we would have conflicting facts listed all over the place which is not the case- the bfi entry has been checked against the GRO index and the GRO are the people who issue certificates so I really think there is no longer any doubt on this issue. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel (talk) 20:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Dates

I see you reverted my edits to Kevin Keegan. The automatic linking of dates is now deprecated - see Wikipedia:Date#Date_autoformatting for the reasons. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I note what you say, but the link you give doesn't say that the dates should NOT be de-linked, but that they don't HAVE to be. The Keegan article has dates in at least three different formats, so for non-registered users the article is rather muddled. (Turn off your date preferences and you'll see what I mean.) I can't see any reason for keeping the date links, nor why you feel the need to revert my edits on some point of principal. What does your reversion do to improve the content of Wikipedia? Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

S/S edits

It is obvious you are opinionated here.

I'm not here to edit war, thus why I have left out the perfectly good uncited information on the transport part, which is similar in the way the paris article was on the link WPnot you gave on the history page of the South Shields article, though be it the Paris article is cited.

I have no problem with anyone taking down uncited stuff, knowing that this encourages cited editing.

But with regards to the Rugby bit, it is cited. And you have no right to dictate to anyone what is put in.

It is also to small for an article and no doubt someone with a POV like yours would put it up for deletion. So as it is it stays in the South Shields article as a description were it belongs since it is from S/Shields.

I honestly do not believe for one second you want every wiki article topic to be one sentence without reference.

Would you read a knowledge base that bland as one sentence?

So to me it is obvious you are just being disruptive and trying to infringe the sucess of the article in the wiki project. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.68.63 (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


Your edits to South Shields

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on South Shields. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Keith D (talk) 22:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to South Shields, you will be blocked from editing.

Courts of (the Republic of) Ireland

You are possibly already aware but the anon IP jumping editor(s) is changing a series of articles in recent days by diluting "Republic of Ireland" to "Ireland" - sometimes by just pipe linking.

I have reverted most of there changes, but whilst I respect WP:3RR, that anon IP jumping editor does not. So if your interested in becoming active in the wider reversion of what is essentially vandalism by the anon IP jumping editor please feel free.

Regards. Djegan (talk) 17:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Top Gear Races

I have nominated Top Gear Races, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Gear Races. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Spartaz Humbug! 00:24, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created, Top_Gear_Races maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

  1. You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
  2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
  3. When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
    Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
    Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
  4. You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 03:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

KKeegan

Hi,

Thanks for correcting my mistake.

what did you by copyedit?

Regards,

ToonIsALoon (talk) 21:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Requested move (Newcastle Central railway station → Newcastle railway station)

Hi, DrFrench. As you have been previously involved in discussions regarding the name of the above mentioned article, I thought you may be interested to know there has been a request made to move and rename the article. If you'd like to get involved, please see here for the discussion which led to the request and here for the requested move poll. Regards, Dbam Talk/Contributions 21:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

T&W Metro Fare Anomolies

I see you added this information on many Metro station pages, but there isn't really much explanation of it, just a table. Also, I'm not sure (and unsure how to check) if this information is still accurate. What are your views on all of this? beeblebrox (talk) 21:31, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Chiltern Railways

That's what I thought when I first reverted it here. I was then pressurised into re-adding it by Tris2000 which I then did, against my better judgement, after a re-write. To be honest, I though it had a little merit, but looking back, I think it's best that the section be removed. Cheers. Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 23:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

TV infoboxes

Hi you just beat me to the infobox. I was just doing it in my sandbox. one point about the picture format. Surely this should be Filmed 16:9 widescreen for this is what people would need to know. When shown in other countries it will use whatever system the broadcaster uses ie: secam, ntsc. Some programs we get here in Britain are filmed 16:9 but shown 4:3 pan and scan. this will probably happen somewhere in the world REVUpminster (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

You are a brave man

Well done to have zapped LO timetable minutiae. I was too cowardly to. How about the busfans' lists of every stop and street used by a bus route?--SilasW (talk) 16:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Abbey Line

Personal attack and abuse added 13:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC) by Bhtpbank removed.


The article does have an inline citation that references the Abbey Flyer. It is reference [2].
If you are an example of a "good" wikipedian then you need to improve. Seriously, if you cannot take the time to read an article properly and understand it, then you really shouldn't be editing. A "good" editor on Wikipedia would understand this without having to quote various rules and guidelines. It is an inherent quality. I think you are the one that needs to reappraise why you are editing on Wikipedia. As to be quite honest, I think that you are wasting your time and that of other editors. Bhtpbank (talk) 08:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

BR Class 313s

My uncited contribs under the Southern section are first-hand information. It's not published in any rail mags. I work on the project and the info is all correct. Can't very well cite myself.--StotheH (talk) 20:54, 8 March 2010 (GMT)

Shrewsbury railway station

I can't help but notice you are interested in editing this article, maybe you could help by updating the Historical Railways infobox here to include the Severn Valley Railway as in the stations at Berrington, Cound and Cressage. As it stands i am not too well versed with the type of infobox that has been used, thank you. CrossHouses (talk) 22:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Minor update to this request. I have attempted to add this information however it could do with a bit of work to integrate it with the other infoboxes. CrossHouses (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Got your message, thank you. CrossHouses (talk) 23:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Alt text

Sorry about this but I never knew about it for people who have images turned off. I did not know you could turn images off. I saw your edit and once I understood what it was for I shall go through my uploaded images and add the necessary edit.REVUpminster (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Cool. And I didn't realise the guidelines for that template said not to include a caption if the image included the programme name. So I guess we both learned something new... a win-win! DrFrench (talk) 22:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Panel game

Hello! I saw your editing of the panel game article and would really appreciate it if you could briefly pop into a discussion on the Hollywood Squares article on whether it is a panel game (there are cited descriptions if you're unfamiliar with the show). Here's the discussion. Thank you so much! 76.105.176.44 (talk) 22:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Underground stock

Hi Dr, French
Please see Template talk:Infobox Underground stock#Additional parameters. Peter Horn User talk 22:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Additional parameters

DrFrench,
Please see Template talk:Infobox Underground stock#Additional parameters. Peter Horn User talk 19:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 19:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

british spelling

Good eye catching the american spelling change that needed to be made on a british article. Nice work!--RichardMills65 (talk) 00:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Marje proops.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Marje proops.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Eccles line link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Redrose64 (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Newcastle meetup

Hi, please forgive the unsolicited spam. I'm hoping to establish a regular Wikipedia meetup in Newcastle, the first of which is to be held on 15 September. Since you're in Category:Wikipedians in Tyne and Wear, I hoped you might be interested. If you can make it, please do sign up on Meta, and if you can't make this one but would be interested in future Newcastle meetups, please add your name to the "apologies" section so we know there's interest. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Four lane ends metro station.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Four lane ends metro station.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

There are also several related images being included in this nomination. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Nazi Germany VS Third Reich discussion needs your voice

You are invited to participate in the Nazi Germany VS Third Reich discussion Axelode (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox T&W Metro station

Template:Infobox T&W Metro station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Manchester Metrolink station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newsnight Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Current affairs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox T&W Metro station

Template:Infobox T&W Metro station has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox station. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 07:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mahmood Hussein Mattan.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mahmood Hussein Mattan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Diolch

The Wales Barnstar
Thanks for taking the time to improve the article Mahmood Hussein Mattan. Not only does the article look far better, but you're style of writing is impressive too. Thought you would approve of a Welsh barnstar rather than a general one. Keep it up. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Boosh (radio series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Wallace. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert and Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Lindsay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julie Enfield Investigates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DrFrench. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philip Elsmore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DrFrench. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Arnott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Bolton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

All-white jury

Hello DrFrench. Sorry to revert your recent edit at this article. But the subject is specifically about discrimination within the U.S. legal system, and how American legal theory has evolved to address those issues. If there were a discussion, or an additional section, about a similar situation in a country outside the United States (if there is a parallel), it would probably be just a compare and contrast. Not an instance of the application of U.S. Constitutional protections. But if you have a view about how we might rightly globalize this article, and improve it, please forge ahead with your suggestions. Regards! Gulbenk (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tfl logos.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tfl logos.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:52, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Kelly (businessman), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Monument, Newcastle upon Tyne

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. DrFrench, thanks for creating Monument, Newcastle upon Tyne!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please improve the references to support this new ward boundary

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:London Buses route W7

Template:London Buses route W7 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:53, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aberystwyth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cardigan
Oswestry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ellesmere

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Ffeil title card.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 21:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Stwnsh logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hacio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Current affairs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Hacio logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Golwg360 website screenshot.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Heno tv programme logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Border Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prince Albert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Reveille cover 25 Nov 1977.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Welsh language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abingdon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Scrum V title card.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Clwb Rygbi title card.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helena Little, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casualty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Sportsnight title card.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:27, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve Penk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DrFrench. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DrFrench. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weekend World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Current affairs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Luton DART (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sutton
Stadler Citylink (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sutton

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DrFrench/Archive_1&oldid=1144241435"